Click HERE to Call Free for immediate help! 0800 612 7211
Every situation is different so by far the best way to find out how to respond to a social media legal issue is to speak to those who are most likely to have dealt with a situation similar to yours.
To find out how you can improve your reputation on the internet simply select one of the easy methods of contacting us.

We will respond as soon as possible.

FREEPHONE 0800 612 7211
(+) 44 207 183 4 123 from outside the UK.

TheInternet LawCentre
US internet law attorney

How to instruct an internet law attorney in the US
If you are looking for a US internet lawyer or an internet law attorney to help you to obtain a court order, a disclosure order, a subpoena, or an injunction against a USA based website, our firm works with nearly 100 associate attorneys in the US and Canada.
Potential issues for UK clients who instruct the wrong internet law attorney in the US
Why instruct us to oversee your USA internet law case
Obtaining a subpoena against website operators in the US
Potential issues for UK clients who instruct the wrong internet law attorneys in the US
Whilst the internet provides access to information about lawyers and attorneys from all over the world, when it comes to your legal work, it is important that you ensure that the attorney you instruct across the ocean is of the highest calibre, is experienced in the area of law for which they accept your instructions and that their charges are kept under control. We know that for most individuals who have had a limited amount of dealings with lawyers and attorneys, let alone overseas, finding and then instructing a new lawyer, particularly in a relatively unfamiliar area of law and in another country, can be daunting.
It is not only the costs to consider, but it is the quality of the work that most people would be concerned about when instructing from the UK, a US attorney. Internet law is the fastest growing area of law in the US, which means a growing number of attorneys are jumping on the internet law bandwagon, making a risky, treacherous and a highly complicated branch of the law, very dangerous to their unsuspecting clients. The damage that a well intending yet inexperienced US (or UK) attorney may cause your internet law case and to you personally, by misapplying the law or by misinterpreting a particular situation or by responding or initiating communication or proceedings inappropriately, or by filing for a claim or for a subpoena in the wrong jurisdiction is often irreversible. Inexperienced attorneys are the most common cause of the Streisand Effect, which is an unintended consequence of publicising more widely the very same information you might be trying to protect or remove from the internet.
Why instruct us to oversee your US internet law case
If you are looking for a US internet law attorney, you can stop searching now and start relaxing because you have finally arrived at a place of safety. Our lawyers have over 20 years of experience in handling UK-US legal matters and in obtaining and domesticating disclosure and other court orders in the US.
We know personally all the US attorneys that we work with, which are the very best and the most established US internet law attorneys. We have representative attorneys in nearly every State in the US. We carry out work for their US clients here in the UK and they take good care of our UK based clients who seek internet law legal advice in the US.
Obtaining a subpoena against website operators in the US
Before instructing a US attorney to obtain for you a subpoena against website operators in the US, make sure to speak to us as our associate attorneys in the US will be able to obtain subpoenas and disclosure orders from nearly every local court in the US.
This will give you assurance about the work which is carried out for you and will keep the legal costs under control. We speak to our US internet law attorneys almost daily and we meet each one of them at least once or twice a year. We want our clients to be safe, to feel safe and most importantly to be in safe hands, here in the UK and in the US, because the internet is borderless and because we care.
|
Follow on Twitter
Norwich Pharmacal Order
Latest Articles
Porn law
Reputation management
- Business defamation on Google
- Defamation by investors on social media
- Disgruntled employees and company reputation
- Handling online reputation attack globally
- International reputation management
- Online reputation attack legal advice
- Online reputation strategies
- Reputation crisis management
- SEO and online reputation management
- The case of the removal of a cloned Facebook account
Category of work
|
Our clients speak out |
---|
"getting the right results" “Yair Cohen, our solicitor is a very bright, determined person who is committed to... Read More... "Perfect advice, perfect business relationship" “The advice was comprehensive and of very high quality. Furthermore the whole process... Read More... "Have used twice and will use again. " “Excellent, professional service delivered within a tight timeline. Have used twice and... Read More... "I would certainly recommend Mr Cohen without hesitation" “The initial consultation went very well with Mr Cohen and was very informative for... Read More... "Mr Cohen listened carefully." “I had a consultation with Mr Cohen who was clearly knowledgeable in his field and... Read More... "Cohen Davis gave me back my life" Yair Cohen and Cohen Davis acted on my behalf after I had been subjected to a 13 year... Read More... |
Privacy law
- Footballer blackmail legal advice
- How to remove criminal record from Google
- Injunction for breach of privacy
- Is catfishing illegal
- Is it illegal to post private messages on Facebook
- Is it legal to film someone and upload it to YouTube
- Removal of defamatory video from the internet
- The case of DDF v YYZ
- The case of GYH v Persons Unknown
Right to be forgotten
- A case of a successful ICO right to be forgotten appeal
- Google right to be forgotten
- Help with a right to be forgotten
- Removal of google searches worldwide
- Remove court records from Google
- Removing search results under a right to be forgotten
- Right to be forgotten ICO appeal
- Right to be forgotten post Brexit
- Right to be forgotten refused
- The case of the removal of a professional disciplinary hearing from Google
- The case of the removal of newspaper reports about a court case
Online harassment
- The case of Frankie Rzucek
- The case of Kirat Assi v Simran Kaur Bhogal - Sweet Bobby
- The case of Lindsey Goldrick-Dean
- The case of Phipps v Britton-unmasking internet trolls
- Teenage harassment on social media
- Online harassment legal advice
- Cross jurisdiction case of harassment
- Harassment injunctions
- Harassment on Tattle.life
- The case of Rada-Ortiz v Espinosa-Vadillo
- Instagram harassment
- Harassment solicitors no win no fee
- Harassment and defamation on the internet
- Online trolling legal help
- Harassment limitation
- Blackmailer trying to ruin my marriage
- Harassment on social media
- Legal advice for online harassment
- How can we put an end to internet trolling
- Is harassment a crime
- Understanding online blackmail
- UK blackmail lawyer
- The case of XLD v KZL
- Civil harassment and criminal harassment in the UK what is the difference
Our work featured on |
---|
Online defamation
- Cancel culture defamation
- Defamation by competitors case
- Defamation and social media law in the UK
- Defamation by an Ex-Employee
- Defamation by employees
- Defamation cease and desist letter
- Defamation claim against the police
- Defamation injunctions
- Defamation on Blogger
- Defamation on Twitter case
- Defamation on websites
- Defamation removal letter
- Defamation solicitors
- Defamation with SEO
- False accusation of rape on social media
- Falsely accused of rape
- Google business defamation
- Injunction against Google
- Internet defamation lawyers
- Legal action for defamation
- Legal action for libel
- Online Defamation on YouTube
- Remove defamation from Google
- Removing defamation from the internet
- The case of RRR PLC v Gary Carp
- Twitter defamation and harassment
Domain law
|
|