Contact our super friendly Social Media lawyers today!
Click HERE to Call Free for immediate help! 0800 612 7211

Every situation is different so by far the best way to find out how to respond to a social media legal issue is to speak to those who are most likely to have dealt with a situation similar to yours.
To find out how you can improve your reputation on the internet simply select one of the easy methods of contacting us.

Please use the form below to contact us.
We will respond as soon as possible.

Or you can call us on our free hotline.

FREEPHONE 0800 612 7211

(+) 44 207 183 4 123 from outside the UK.

Or if you prefer you can email us to helpline (at) CohenDavis.co.uk.

TheInternet LawCentre

Remove defamation solicitor

If you or your company are the target of defamatory online publications, read on because our defamation solicitors are likely to have come across a similar defamation removal case to yours already, which they would have cracked for another victim.

Our defamation solicitors have successfully removed defamation from hundreds of websites across the world and have excellent relationships with defamation lawyers in the USA, Canada, Australia and Europe, which means we often achieve speedy and cost effective outcomes for our clients.

Removing defamation from the internet

You've been dragged through the mud on the internet. Your reputation is being assaulted with vicious lies, and you don't even know who's telling them.

The situation is urgent, but what should you do? You do a little research but find conflicting advice: Hire an SEO expert! Hire a PR consultant! Talk to someone experienced in e-commerce sales! Get yourself a lawyer.

The truth is, removing defamation from the internet involves no single magic solution.

After many years of costly trial and error, here's what I discovered: Only one trick will secure you the best opportunity to remove defamation from the internet from public view, and this trick is called EXPERIENCE. Believe me when I tell you this. I am a lawyer!

Get your
...
Defamation by investors on social media

Defamation by investors - defamation against a company and defamation against directors

In a case that is believed to be the first of its kind in the UK concerning online defamation by investors against a company, online defamation and social media specialist solicitor firm Cohen Davis won damages for its PLC client, a gold mining company Red Rock Resources (RRR) after the company was defamed on social media by one of its small yet vocal investors.
Unmasking Internet Trolls. Harassment and blackmail on the internet

Cohen Davis has won in the case of Phipps v Britton an apology and substantial damages from Paul Britton and his company Origin Design Ltd after they defamed, harassed and cyberbullied our client in a series of websites they created about him. This was a case where the victim felt he had been blackmailed on the internet to settle a debt. The apology took the form of a statement in open court read before His Honour Judge Moloney QC on Wednesday 20 May 2015.

Discovering the identity of internet commentators who post abusive and defamatory content online and who use an anonymous identity to defame you or your business, is often a hugely challenging, if at times impossible task and one that continues to be a global problem for victims of such internet abuse. The police in any jurisdiction will typically be very limited in being able to assist in circumstances of anonymous internet abuse and from
...
Remove defamation from PropertyTribes 03 April 2014

Jurisdiction: United Kingdom.

Pages removed from: Property Tribes.

Date of removal: 03 April 2014.

Number of web pages removed: 10+.

Additional information: 1 defamatory thread. Our defamation solicitors assisted in the removal of a thread of defamatory posts against our client, an international property agent. This was achieved through communication with the website operator and without the
...
How to post a review which is not illegal

What can I say in an online review without risking a claim for defamation?

Some authors of online reviews about businesses are not aware that in England, when it comes to defamation, the reviewer could be liable not just for the words published , but also to the innuendo. Innuendo is a hint, or a meaning that once may attribute to the words themselves. It follows, that in defamation cases in England, a reviewer is unlikely to escape liability just because the express words used were not strictly speaking defamatory. What is also important is what readers of the online review understand from reading the review. People’s understanding of a matte often goes beyond the simple words used. Readers of online reviews have learned to read between the lines.
Defamation by competitors

Have you recently suffered defamation by competitors?

Online defamation by competitors is not unheard of. Below is one classic example of defamation by competitors of a small family business.

Jeff Clark, a husband and a father of three children ages 3, 6, and 10, has always loved cars. He has been fixing them since he was 12, and has worked in local garages around the Manchester area for many years.
The case of Selvaratnam Suresh v Commissioner of the Police of the Metropolis

Defamation Claim Against The Police

The Claimant was the Chairman of the Oriental Fine Arts Academy of London (“OFAAL”), a registered charity. He was a well-regarded community worker and a leader within the Tamil community in England and across Europe. Allegations were made to the police against the Claimant, that he committed fraud. Part of the alleged fraud was that he unlawfully altered an official charity document. Those were false allegations for which the Claimant successfully sued his accusers for defamation.

The Detective Sergeant, who investigated the allegations on behalf of the Metropolitan police wrote an email to the accusers where he said the Claimant abused his position as
...
Defamation on a review website

How to respond to defamation on a review website.

Whether you are the victim of corporate defamation or of individual defamation, before responding to a bad review or to online defamation read this!

Don't rush it.

If you are considering writing a response to the defamatory article or to the negative review, then don't rush it.
Remove defamation from Facebook 01 May 2014

Location: United State, California.
Pages removed from: Facebook.

Date of removal: 1 May 2014.

Number of web pages removed: 1.

Additional information: Our defamation solicitors removed 1 defamatory Facebook Page together with history and referring links from various Facebook accounts on behalf of our client, who works in the entertainment industry and who suffered for many months from defamation on Facebook.
Defamation on websites

I have been defamed on the internet. What can I do about this?

The ability to list web pages on the top page of the search results for a long period of time is normally a function of either excellent workmanship or an unintended random consequence of Google algorithm. Names of individuals and companies are easy targets for the purpose of internet defamation or even just to cause someone reputational, emotional or financial damage.
How to Remove False and Defamatory Reviews

Questions about defamatory online reviews

Many people genuinely believe and even insist that review websites are there to enhance consumer’s ability to make the right choice or to educate them in choosing; a reputable supplier, a builder, an estate agent or even a holiday provider - and they are dead wrong. The truth is that the vast majority of those who operate review websites have clever systems that are aimed at benefitting them financially by encouraging visitors to their website to write negative reviews. This is often achieved by attacking and consequently destroying the reputation of good, honest and well established businesses across the UK.
Defamation and injunctions lawyers

Can I obtain an injunction against Google?

The first UK Google injunction was obtained in 2011 by Yair Cohen. The order required Google to reveal personal details of individuals who were defaming a UK business on the internet.

The claimant, who was seeking the injunction against Google was a news publishing group, Wyvern Media, which at the time was servicing tens of thousands of customers each year. Despite Wyvern's genuine attempt to satisfy them all, a small number of customers remained disgruntled.
Remove defamation from Twitter 19 May 2016

Jurisdiction: United States
Pages removed from: Twitter

Date of removal: 20 May 2016

Number of pages removed: 1

Additional information: Our client became victim of blackmail on the internet which was carried out on social media by a number of individuals. Our defamation lawyers took swift action to close down a defamatory Twitter account because it was
...
Remove reviews

False reviews and other defamatory statements that appear on the internet often leave the targeted business suffocating for cash and investment. Our well polished processes to removing defamatory web pages and forum posts from the internet often gives our clients the kiss of life that saves the business from bankruptcy.
Remove defamation from RipOffReport.com 6 June 2016

Jurisdiction: United States
Pages removed from: RipOffReport.com

Date of removal: 6 June 2016

Number of pages removed: 5

Additional information: Our client was located in the USA but had substantial business interests in the United Kingdom. First, our client with the help of our US internet law attorneys obtained an injunction in the US to prevent the
...
Remove Reviews from Yelp.com

Many business owners who find themselves victims of the 1 in 5 (acknowledged!) fake reviews on Yelp.com will admit that fake reviews are a business killer.

So when I first read Yelp.com advice to victims of fake reviewsI thought they were faking it.

Fabricated stories that are made to sound credible with loads of ‘detailed information’ about the ‘real experience’ suffered by average Joe whilst shopping at your store/restaurant/office are as common as the name Joe.

It is now scientifically proven that at least a fifth of
...
Remove review from Google and MoneySavingExpert.co.uk 09 February 2017

Jurisdiction: United States
Review removed from: MoneySavingExert.co.uk

Date of removal: 09 February 2017

Number of pages removed: 1

Additional information: Our client is a successful director of a small business installing driveways and patios and was subjected to defamation on the internet. The defamation included the creation of a forum where
...
Is it illegal to fake online reviews?‎

Are fake reviews legal in the UK?

Writing a fake online review has never been easier. A fast growing industry of online review ‎websites leaves very little hope to those business owners who want to play it fair. ‎

The number of fake online reviews is constantly growing. A significant number of fake online ‎reviews are written by business owners who often act in despair after becoming ‎victims of fake online reviews.‎
The opportunity - a right to be forgotten

Adverse results from search engines can often have severe consequences, sometimes affecting you as an individual, sometimes affecting your family and at other times affecting your business. This will seem particularly unfair where the information presented by the search engine against your name or the name of your business is untrue, deceptive or very old.
SEO and a right to be forgotten

Many "webpage removal specialists" offer to remove bad pages from the search results by using search engine optimisation (SEO).

It is a series of techniques that companies use to try and make their websites appear on the first pages of internet search results.

It is largely a promotional tool which, if used knowledgeably, can bring almost any business tons of success. SEO is a good medicine to cure marketing problems. But when it comes to a bad and rapidly spreading case of infectious defamation, SEO might be less effective.

Remember that SEO is a preventative tool. It does not "remove" or "delete" bad search results but only temporarily pushes them down the search results.

If the information that you wish to remove
...
Remove review from Google: dentist 15 June 2017

Jurisdiction: United States
Reviews removed from: Google Business listings

Date of removal: 15 June 2017

Number of reviews removed: 5

Additional information: Our client is a dental practice with several dental clinics across London. Over a brief period of time our client's Google listings of one of its dental practices has been subjected to 5 highly
...
Stop defamation from anonymous source 08 May 2017

Jurisdiction: United Kingdom
Pages removed from: WordPress

Date of removal: 08 May 2017

Number of pages removed: 1

Additional information: Our client, a successful mining company incorporated in Australia, was defamed on the internet. A website was published, containing highly defamatory articles with the intent of causing our client as much damage as possible.
...
Remove defamation from PistonHeads 15 November 2016

Jurisdiction: United Kingdom
Pages removed from: PistonHeads forum

Date of removal: 15 November 2016

Number of pages removed: 1 post

Additional information: Our client was exposed to a campaign of defamation and harassment on the internet. Internet users who would Google the client’s company would be linked to a forum including highly defamatory adjectives. Despite the fact that
...
Remove defamatory review from Yell.com 20 December 2016

Jurisdiction: United States
Review removed from: Yell.com

Date of removal: 20 December 2016

Number of pages removed: 1

Additional information:Our defamation solicitors removed highly defamatory reviews posted on Yell.com on behalf of our client, a successful business owner who owned a national plumbing business and was
...
Remove review from Google maps 01 May 2017

Jurisdiction: United States
Review removed from: Google Maps

Date of removal: 02 May 2017

Number of pages removed: 1

Additional information: Our client is a small company that like many in the UK is relying on Google searches to acquire new customers. After our client increase their prices, one of their customers tried to negotiate a discount. When this was
...
Defamation by an Ex-Employee

Defamation by an ex-employee. What can I do about it?

It is not uncommon for disgruntled former employees to go on a campaign of defamation against their former employer’s company.

The defamation normally occurs through blogs, emails and by initiation of discussion groups in forums aimed at throwing as much dirt as possible at the former employee's company.
Remove defamation from RussianAnamerica.com 27 September 2013

Jurisdiction: United State, New York.
Pages removed from: Forum Russian America.com

Date of removal: 27 September 2013.

Number of web pages removed: 50+.

Additional information: Removed 2 threads. Language: Russian.
Remove defamation from Ripoff Report 23 October 2013

Jurisdiction: United State, Arizona.
Pages removed from: Rip Off Report.

Date of removal: 23 October 2013.

Number of web pages removed: 2.

Additional information: Removed defamation from RipOffReport. Obtained disclosure orders and identified poster who was subsequently arrested, prosecuted and convicted at Iselworth Crown Court. We
...
Deletion of Instagram accounts 04 June 2015

Jurisdiction: United Kingdom.

Pages removed from: instagram.

Date of removal: 04 June 2015.

Number of web pages removed: 75+.

Additional information: In this case our client, who works in the entertainment industry suffered harassment and abuse on Instagram. We obtained an injunction
...
Defamation by investors solicitor - large companies

Meet Gary. Gary was a small investor in listed public companies who held shares in a gold mining company RRR PLC. As an active investor, Gary used to be involved in online investment forums such as Interactive Investors.
9 Steps to Avoid Online Defamation by Employees and Former Business Partners

How to Prevent Becoming a Victim of Defamation by Former Employees and Partners?

How to describe that first shocking moment when you discover that the reputation of your business is being tarnished all over the internet? There’s really nothing else like it, and it is followed by sleepless nights and constant worry. For some business people whose reputation is attacked online, things will never be the same again.

Just imagine: As you lie awake wishing the problem would go away, instead, it is spreading throughout the internet. Within weeks, sometimes even days, there is more defamatory material every time you look.
Remove reports from ScamExposure 06 October 2015

Jurisdiction: United States,
Pages removed from:ScamExposure

Date of removal: 6 October 2015.

Number of pages removed:12 reviews.

Additional information: ScamExposure is a website which is located in the USA and which is known to be used to defame and harass businesses and individuals who are then left with little or no legal recourse to have the
...
Remove fake business reviews from Google 26 October 2015

Jurisdiction: United States
Pages removed from: Google

Date of removal: 26 October 2015

Number of pages removed: 2

Additional information: Our client, a professional self-employed person, was subjected to a campaign of defamation and harassment on the internet. The campaign was carried out by competitors who spread lies about our client and about his
...
Remove defamatory reviews from Google and Google+ 11 December 2015

Jurisdiction: United Kingdom
Pages removed from: Google and Google+

Date of removal: 11 December 2015

Number of web pages removed: 2

Additional information: Our defamation lawyers acted for a national motor repair company. A disgruntled customer defamed our client’s company on the internet and said he
...
Remove defamation from YouTube 2 February 2016

Jurisdiction: United States
Pages removed from: YouTube.com

Date of removal: 2 February 2016

Number of pages removed: 1 video, description and comments

Additional information: Our client, an international investment company was defamed on the internet by disgruntled investors. This included publishing a highly defamatory video on YouTube, which included defamatory
...
Removed business reviews from Google 20 October 2015

Jurisdiction: United States
Pages removed from: Google Plus

Date of removal: 20 October 2015

Number of pages removed: 2

Additional information: Our client, a professional person and a sole trader, was subjected to a campaign of online defamation, possible by competitors who were trying to ruin his business. The campaign included defamatory reviews on Google,
...
Remove defamation from HarringayOnline.com 8 June 2016

Jurisdiction: United Kingdom
Pages removed from: www.HarringayOnline.com

Date of removal: 8 June 2016

Number of web pages removed: 1

Additional information: Our client, a party wall surveyor, was subjected to a campaign of harassment on the internet. The campaign included posting
...
Fake online reviews about restaurants legal advice.

This is business sabotage in the digital age. It is far more common than you might imagine and new enterprises are particularly vulnerable as they are at their weakest. The ‎culprits will normally be more established operators in their ‎sector/field who are seeking to ‘smother them in the cradle’ or ‎perhaps stifle their growth when they begin to feel the ‎effects of the competition on their own business.

It might also be from established entities who are retaliating ‎to what the incorrectly perceive to be similar behaviour on ‎the part of others. ‎ Restaurants are especially vulnerable to fake reviews. A recent study from Harvard University entitled, "fake it 'till you make it" shows that independent restaurants are much more likely to post fake reviews about their competitors than any other sector. Equally, they are quite fond of making up good ones about themselves.

...
Remove defamation from WordPress 20 May 2016

Jurisdiction: United States
Pages removed from: WordPress

Date of removal: 20 May 2016

Number of pages removed: 1

Additional information: Our client, a successful dairy farmer became victim of defamation by a disgruntled ex-employee who created a blog on WordPress defaming our client by falsely claiming he was being abused as an employee.
...
Removed defamatory blog 22 June 2016

Jurisdiction: France
Pages removed from: Wordpress Blog

Date of removal: 22 June 2016

Number of web pages removed: 1

Additional information: This website removal concerned a leading offshore investment company, which had fallen victim to a popular defamatory blog which was operated from
...
Removed defamation Tapa.co.uk 4 July 2016

Jurisdiction: United Kingdom
Pages removed from: Tapa.co.uk

Date of removal: 4 July 2016

Number of web pages removed: 1

Additional information: Tapa.co.uk is a website dedicated to exposing alleged advertising "scams" in the UK. Our defamation lawyers were instructed that the website includes a list of
...
Removed defamation from Nuisancecalls.org.uk 7 April 2016

Jurisdiction: United Kingdom
Pages removed from: nuisancecalls.org.uk

Date of removal: 7 April 2016

Number of web pages removed: 20+

Additional information: Our defamation and harassment solicitors successfully liaised with the website operators to secure the removal
...
Removed from Google (ICO right to be forgotten application) 23 March 2016

Jurisdiction: United Kingdom
Pages removed from: Google searches (Daily Mirror)

Date of removal: 23 March 2016

Number of web pages removed:1

Additional information: Our right to be forgotten lawyers made an application to the Information Commissioner’s
...
Defamation with SEO

How SEO is used to spread defamation

Everyone has a soft spot. Being called a certain bad name in public could cause you a lot of damage and harm your career.

For example, a doctor might be described as "negligent", a solicitor as "incompetent", a builder as a "cowboy", or a teacher as "stupid". Such labels would be regarded by any of these people as a personal attack on their reputation and integrity.

But perhaps the most harmful insult of all was suffered by a top civil servant who was a social worker for the Children’s Service at a district council in the north of the country.
Remove defamation from Money Saving Expert 15 April 2014

Jurisdiction: United Kingdom.

Pages removed from: Money Saving Expert.

Date of removal: 24 March 2014.

Number of web pages removed: 50+.

Additional information: 2 offending threads of reviews against a hotel were deleted. Our defamation solicitors facilitated the removal of 2 defamatory threads which contained dozens of defamatory comments against our client, who is the owner of a chain of
...
Defamation Cease and Desist letter

How effective should a defamation cease and desist letter be when your aim is to have online defamation removed from a web page, a blog or a forum?
How to overcome negative online reviews

It is possible to ease the pain caused by online defamation through principles of tactical transparency. There are numerous examples of organisations that for a period of time suffered sustained attacks on their reputation but nevertheless managed to come out at the end of the dark tunnel cleaner, stronger and loved by their customers.
Defamation removal letter

Can I write a letter to ask for the web page that contains defamation to be removed from the internet?

Online Reputation travels fast and because so many members of the public wrongly believe that they can hide behind a made up name in an online forum to post comments without being accountable for the consequences of their comments, you can see how your business reputation could be completely tarnished almost overnight.
Remove reviews from Google reviews 02 October 2015

Jurisdiction: United States,
Pages removed from: Google reviews

Date of removal: 2 October 2015.

Number of pages removed: 2 reviews.

Additional information: Our defamation solicitors removed a 2 highly defamatory reviews from Google reviews (Google Plus) by communicating with Google. No legal action was required. The reviews were removed on behalf of a
...
Remove defamation from Weebly 04 May 2015

Jurisdiction: United State,
Pages removed from: Weebly

Date of removal: 04 May 2015.

Number of pages removed: 2 websites.

Additional information: Our defamation solicitors removed 2 defamatory and harassing websites that targeted our client, a former senior United Nation employee. Our lawyers obtained an injunction against the creator of the websites and had the
...
Remove defamation and private information from Blogger 21 May 2015

Jurisdiction: United State, California.
Pages removed from: Blogger.

Date of removal: 21 May 2015.

Number of web pages removed: 2.

Additional information: Our defamation solicitors removed reviews from Blogger as well as remove unlawfully obtained image of our client. The allegations on Blogger were highly defamatory suggesting our client was involved in deception
...
Removed defamation from EstateAgentToday 29 May 2015

Jurisdiction: United Kingdom.
Defamation removed from: EstateAgentToday.
Date of removal: 29 May 2015.

Number of web pages removed: 25.

Additional information: We removed defamatory posts from this UK based website, EstateAgentToday on behalf of a high street law firm. A number of lawyers were defamed on EstateAgentToday by posts and comments in relation to property transactions and the quality of the work and services they allegedly delivered.
...
Remove defamation from Blogger 22 July 2015

Jurisdiction: United State, California.
Pages removed from: Blogger.

Date of removal: 22 July 2015.

Number of web pages removed: 2.

Additional information: Our defamation solicitors removed defamation and private information from Blogger, a blogging platform that is operated by Google. We have successfully requested the removal of the entire blog from the internet on the basis that the information it
...
Removed defamation from Google Plus 23 July 2015

Jurisdiction: United State, California.
Pages removed from: Google Plus.

Date of removal: 23 July 2015.

Number of web pages removed: 7.

Additional information: Our defamation solicitors remove reviews from Google Plus on behalf of our client who is a letting agent and who had had a large number of defamatory reviews posted about his business.
...
Remove defamation from Yelp 29 July 2015

Jurisdiction: United State, San Francisco.
Pages removed from: Yelp.

Date of removal: 29 July 2015.

Number of web pages removed: 1.

Additional information: Our solicitors successfully facilitated the deletion of a defamatory reviews published on Yelp.co.uk on behalf of our client, an estate agency who operates nationally. The fake review on Yelp had caused substantial loss
...
Remove defamation from Paydayloansdigest 05 August 2015

Jurisdiction: United Kingdom
Pages removed from: Paydayloansdigest.com
Date of removal: 05 August 2015.

Number of web pages removed: 1.

Additional information: Our defamation solicitors remove a defamatory post from Paydayloansdigest on behalf of our client, a former executive in the so called Payday industry.
Remove defamation from Studentlandlorder 14 August 2015

Jurisdiction: United Kingdom
Pages removed from: Studentlandlorder.com

Date of removal: 14 August 2015 .

Number of web pages removed: 3.

Additional information: Our defamation solicitors facilitated the removal of 3 defamatory reviews posted on
...
Remove defamation from Muckrack 21 August 2015

Jurisdiction: United State, New York.
Pages removed from: Muckrack.com.

Date of removal: 21 August 2015.

Number of web pages removed: 1.

Additional information: Our defamation solicitors removed a defamatory post from Muckrack.com which included an unauthorised image of our client.
Removed search results from Google under the Right to be Forgotten 07 September 2015

Jurisdiction: United State, California
Pages removed from: Google searches

Date of removal: 07 October 2015

Number of search results removed from Google: 2

Additional information: Our defamation solicitors removed 2 search results from Google searches in relation to 14 search phrases.

...
Remove defamation from ComplaintsBoard 15 September 2015

Jurisdiction: United State,
Pages removed from: ComplaintsBoard

Date of removal: 15 September 2015.

Number of pages removed: 21 pages.

Additional information: Our defamation solicitors removed 21 defamatory posts against our client's business from ComplaintsBoard. Our lawyers worked with Google to have those pages completely removed from searches within and outside
...
Remove defamation from Blogger 25 September 2015

Jurisdiction: United States,
Pages removed from: Blogger

Date of removal: 25 September 2015.

Number of pages removed: 1 post and 4 images.

Additional information: Our defamation solicitors removed a post and 5 highly defamatory comments as well as images of our client from a Blogger based website. The defamation was removed by the blogger following negotiations with
...
Remove defamation from RipOffReport 06 October 2015

Jurisdiction: United States,
Pages removed from: RipOffReport.

Date of removal: 6 October 2015.

Number of pages removed: 6 reports.

Additional information: RipOffReport is a website located in the USA and which which is notorious for being difficult to have defamation removed from. In this case, our client, a property investment company who was defamed on
...
Fake online reviews

It is estimated by researchers that between 16 to 20 per cent of social media reviews are fake. We believe however that the real number is much higher.

We believe that between 50 to 65 per cent of all online reviews are fake.

A research by Harvard Business School entitled“Fake It Till You Make It: Reputation, Competition, and Yelp Review Fraud 24 September 2013” points to an emerging industry of fake review creation, which is primarily being driven by business owners who either leave positive reviews for themselves, negative reviews for their competitors or a combination of both.
Defamation injunctions

Internet defamation, is becoming more and more a survival issue for a growing number of individuals and organisations across the UK.

In most cases where we are instructed to remove defamation from the internet, we do so successfully and without putting our clients through expensive litigation. In most cases we can facilitate the removal of defamatory web pages through an affordable, yet persuasive Cease and Desist letter or by negotiations.

Even if the offending website is located outside the jurisdiction of the English Courts, a well drafted letter might still be sufficient to have the defamatory content removed.

However, more and more internet service providers such as Google and Bing ask for a court order before they agree to remove defamation from their
...
Defamation on review Websites – An Overview

Review websites are either Industry Specific or Multi Area. They create an image of a service for the public good whilst in fact, they are commercial enterprises, they are not altruistic. Their commodity is YOUR reputation, and it's free of charge. Review websites often claim to have a right to publish without responsibility for content. This claim is false; in many cases operators of review websites are also the publishers and often the editors of the posts and are therefore liable to you for defamation.
Why you should you care about online reviews

When was the last time you searched online for information about ‎your own company? If the answer to this question is ‎‎“never” then you are not alone. But you also need to read on…‎

Many organisations spend little or no time in researching ‎themselves on the internet. This makes sense on the face of ‎it; what could you possibly learn that you don’t already ‎know? ‎But it is precisely this subconscious dismissal of the notion ‎that you could find something out that you don’t already ‎know that enables negative ‘information’ from going ‎undetected for so long and causing so much damage.
Online Defamation on YouTube

Online reputation attacks can be significantly more powerful when videos are used to attack someone’s reputation. Google, which owns YouTube, appears to be pushing hard to include video posts in its search results. If there is an available video match to a specific search term, it is likely that this video will score highly in the search terms and make its way to the top page of the search results.

Google aims to offer those who use its search engine a variety of information types, including regular web pages, blogs, social networks, videos, and images.
Remove Review from Review Centre

Review Centre is one of the largest and most influential business review websites in the UK. Unfortunately, many reviews on ReviewCentre are fake with the majority being posted by or on behalf of competitors. The likelihood of us being able to facilitate the removal of fake and defamatory online reviews from ReviewCentre is high and to date all our attempts have been sucessfull.
Remove searches from Google under the Right to be Forgotten 09 December 2014

Jurisdiction: United State, California.
Pages removed from: Google searches

Date of removal: 09 December 2014.

Number of search results removed from Google: 2.

Additional information: We applied to Google for Right to be forgotten. Our client was the victim of a criminal campaign of stalking and harassment which had a sever mental affect on her and the family. The online blog
...
Remove defamation from Gaydar 25 June 2015

Jurisdiction: United Kingdon.
Pages removed from: Gaydar.com
Date of removal: 25 June 2015.

Number of web pages removed: 1.

Additional information: Our defamation solicitors removed private information from gay porn website, Gaydar. The defamation was posted by unknown users against our client who was targeted for unknown reasons. Our defamation solicitors communicated with the website operators and successfully removed the personal information from the website.
Remove defamation from MoneySavingExpert 03 April 2014

Jurisdiction: United Kingdom.
Pages removed from: Money Saving Expert.

Date of removal: 03 April 2014.

Number of web pages removed: 2.

Additional information: Our defamation solicitors removed 2 defamatory threads from Money Saving Expert website. The user's comments were particularly harmful and were posted over a period of more than 2
...
Inaccurate reporting on The Independent Online 17 March 2015

Jurisdiction: United Kingdom
Pages removed from: The Independent online.
Date of removal: 17 March 2015.

Number of web pages removed:

Additional information: Resolved issue of inaccurate reporting of court proceedings from the Independent Online on behalf of our client, a prominent heart surgeon. Often misreporting by main stream media requires careful negotiations to facilitate a satisfactory outcome for our clients. Most of our clients prefer to resolve
...
Remove defamation from TrustPilot 01 August 2014

Jurisdiction: Denmark
Pages removed from: TrustPilot.

Date of removal: 01 August 2014.

Number of web pages removed: 2.

Additional information: Our defamation solicitors facilitated the removal of a defamatory reviews from TrustPilot. Our client, a successful online retailer was unable to facilitate the removal of the
...
Remove defamation from EastDulwich Forum 29 April 2015

Jurisdiction: United Kingdom.
Defamation removed from: EastDulwich Forum.
Date of removal: 29 April 2015.

Number of web pages removed: 7.

Additional information: Our defamation solicitors removed defamatory posts from this UK based website, EastDulwich Forum on behalf of our client who became victim of a campaign of defamation and harassment on the internet.
Removed defamation from BrentfordTW8 13 July 2015

Jurisdiction: United Kingdom
Pages removed from: BrentfordTW8.com

Date of removal: 13 July 2015.

Number of web pages removed: 1.

Additional information: Our defamation solicitors facilitated the removal of defamatory posts from BrentfordTW8. All the defamatory posts were
...
Remove defamation from Economics Job Market Rumors 13 March 2014

Jurisdiction: United State, Texas.
Pages removed from: Economics Job Market Rumors.

Date of removal: 13 March 2014.

Number of web pages removed: 30+.

Additional information: Our defamation solicitors removed 3 threads on behalf of our client, who is a prominent UK academic.
Remove defamation from cylex-uk 02 June 2015

Jurisdiction: Romania.
Pages removed from: Cylex-UK.
Date of removal: 02 June 2015.

Number of web pages removed: 1.

Additional information: Our defamation solicitors removed defamatory reviews and comments from Manchester Cylex. The defamation was posted by unknown uses against our client who works in the entertainment industry. Our defamation solicitors communicated with the website operators who are based in Romania.
Remove defamation from TycoonSystem 05 May 2015

Jurisdiction: United Kingdom
Pages removed from: Tycoon System.
Date of removal: 05 May 2015.

Number of web pages removed: 1.

Additional information: Our defamation solicitors remove a defamatory review from TycoonSystem on behalf of a law firm from Essex, UK. The defamatory review was posted by an unknown user which meant the solicitor, subject of the defamatory review was unable to investigate the matter alleged or to respond to the defamatory review in any
...
Remove defamation from LawSocietyGazette 26 February 2015

Jurisdiction: United Kingdom.
Pages removed from: Law Society Gazette.

Date of removal: 26 February 2015.

Number of web pages removed: 12.

Additional information: Our solicitors removed from the Law Society Gazette user comments which were posted in response to an editorial article. The defamatory comments referred to our client, a
...
Remove defamation from Forex Peace Army 28 November 2013

Location: United State, New York.
Pages removed from: Forex Peace Army Forum. Global FX Management Trading Ltd.

Date of removal: 28 November 2013.

Number of web pages removed: 5.

Additional information: Our defamation solicitors removed 1 offending thread on behalf of our client and international FX company.
Remove defamation from WordPress 04 December 2013

Location: United State, California.
Pages removed from: Wordpress . com . Automattic

Date of removal: 04 December 2013.

Number of web pages removed: 2.

Additional information: 1 website shut down.
Removed defamation from ebay 24 October 2013

Location: United State, California.
Pages removed from: ebay.

Date of removal: 24 October 2013.

Number of web pages removed: 2.

Additional information: 2 negative feedback removed.
Removed defamation from Cage Warriors 21 November 2013

Jurisdiction: United Kingdom.

Pages removed from: Case Warriors.com.

Date of removal: 21 November 2013.

Number of web pages removed: 30 +.

Additional information: Our defamation lawyers removed 2 offending thread.
Remove defamation from I Petitions 04 April 2014

Jurisdiction: United State, Virginia.
Pages removed from: IPetitions. Tigger LLC.

Date of removal: 04 April 2014.

Number of web pages removed: 1.

Additional information: Removed 1 petition + 9 comments.
Remove defamation from Blogger 14 April 2014

Jurisdiction: United State, California.
Pages removed from: Blogger.

Date of removal: 14 April 2014.

Number of web pages removed: 1.

Additional information: Removed 1 post + 3 live links by application of our defamation solicitors to Google .
Remove defamation from Webs.com 27 April 2014

Location: United States, Atlanta.

Pages removed from: Webs.com.

Date of removal: 27 April 2014.

Number of web pages removed: 10+.

Additional information: Our defamation solicitors acted for a client from the entertainment industry who suffered from defamation on the internet. 1 Website shut down.
Remove defamation from Tycoon Systems 23 September 2013

Location: Germany.

Pages removed from: Tycoon System.com.

Date of removal: 23 September 2013.

Number of web pages removed: 20+

Additional information: Our defamation solicitors removed 2 threads from this website. In this project our social media and internet lawyers acted for a large international property investment company. Our client become the subject of hundreds of defamatory forum comments which were largely posted by
...
Remove defamation from Outofthedark.com 23 September 2014

Jurisdiction: United State, Maryland.
Pages removed from: Outofthedark.com

Date of removal: 23 September 2014.

Number of web pages removed: 1.

Additional information: Our defamation solicitors removed 6 posts from this website. Under a right to be forgotten. In this project our social media lawyers removed from UK and European Google search results references to
...
Remove defamation from Horse and Hound 03 May 2014

Location: United States, Missouri.

Pages removed from: HorseandHound. Savvis.

Date of removal: 03 May 2014.

Number of web pages removed: 10+.

Additional information: Our defamation solicitors removed 2 dedicated threads on behalf our our client who is a national horse breeder.
Remove defamation from Word Press 31 March 2014

Jurisdiction: United State, California.
Pages removed from: Automattic WoredPress.com.

Date of removal: 31 March 2014.

Number of web pages removed: 10+.

Additional information: Part of 1 thread deleted. Our defamation solicitors removed defamatory comments which were posted on WordPress in relation to our client's international property letting business.
Remove defamation from I Love My Cockapoo 28 April 2014

Jurisdiction: Canada.

Pages removed from: Vertical Scope.

Date of removal: 28 April 2014.

Number of web pages removed: 1.

Additional information: 1 comment deleted. Our defamation solicitors removed a highly defamatory thread from this website which operated by Vertical Scope in Canada. The defamation removed was in relation to our client's business as a national dog breeder.
Remove defamation from Review Centre 19 November 2013

Location: United Kingdom.

Pages removed from: ReviewCentre.

Date of removal: 19 November 2013.

Number of web pages removed: 6.

Additional information: 1 thread deleted. Our defamation solicitors facilitated the removal of a defamatory thread from ReviewCentre. The defamatory thread had caused substantial amount of financial damage to our clients, a leading national property management agency.
Remove defamation from Blogger 24 March 2014

Jurisdiction: United State, California.
Pages removed from: Blogger.

Date of removal: 24 March 2014.

Number of web pages removed: 2.

Additional information: Our defamation solicitors persuaded Google to delete 2 blog post from Blooger which is operated by Gooogle.
Remove defamation from RareNyheter 09 April 2014

Jurisdiction: Belgium.

Pages removed from: Rare nyheter.

Date of removal: 9 April 2014.

Number of web pages removed: 50+.

Additional information: 1 thread. Our client was a target of a campaign of harassment of defamation on this website. Our defamation solicitors removed the defamation without having to issue actual legal proceedings.
Remove defamatory Google Autocomplete 17 March 2014

Jurisdiction: United State, California.
Pages removed from: Google Autocomplete/Google search.

Date of removal: 17 March 2014.

Number of web pages removed: 10+.

Additional information: Our defamation lawyers removed 10 search phrase from Google Autocomplete. 13 Additional offending web pages de-indexed from Google searches. The autocomplete referred internet users to defamatory search results against our client, a prominent academic. Google
...

Speak to a defamation lawyer today!
Value packed social media legal advice

Defamation removal letter
How to write an effective defamation removal letter

Unmasking Internet Trolls
How to expose internet trolls

A right to be forgotten appeal
A right to be forgotten appeal to ICO

Search the entire site
Search

Is Yelp.com faking it?
When I first read Yelp.com advice to victims of fake reviews I thought they were faking it. Read More

Remove private information from the internet

Our work featured on

Our clients speak out
"I was retaining their services all the way from the USA" “I was directed to the Cohen Davis Team from another defamation lawyer in the USA who... Read More... "guidance is beyond the value of any fees paid" “Thank you for everything you have done so far, your assistance and guidance is far... Read More... "Perfect advice, perfect business relationship" “The advice was comprehensive and of very high quality. Furthermore the whole process... Read More... "I followed your advice and it worked!" “Thank you Ruzina, I followed the advice given about what to say to my internet trolls... Read More... "Cohen Davis gave me back my life" Yair Cohen and Cohen Davis acted on my behalf after I had been subjected to a 13 year... Read More... "Have used twice and will use again. " “Excellent, professional service delivered within a tight timeline. Have used twice and... Read More... More Articles...

Our clients speak out

"I was retaining their services all the way from the USA"
“I was directed to the Cohen Davis Team from another defamation lawyer in the USA who... Read More...

"guidance is beyond the value of any fees paid"
“Thank you for everything you have done so far, your assistance and guidance is far... Read More...

"Perfect advice, perfect business relationship"
“The advice was comprehensive and of very high quality. Furthermore the whole process... Read More...

"I followed your advice and it worked!"
“Thank you Ruzina, I followed the advice given about what to say to my internet trolls... Read More...

"Cohen Davis gave me back my life"
Yair Cohen and Cohen Davis acted on my behalf after I had been subjected to a 13 year... Read More...

"Have used twice and will use again. "
“Excellent, professional service delivered within a tight timeline. Have used twice and... Read More...

Remove defamation solicitor

Defamation by investors - defamation against a company and defamation against directors

What can I say in an online review without risking a claim for defamation?

Defamation Claim Against The Police

I have been defamed on the internet. What can I do about this?

Can I obtain an injunction against Google?

Defamation by an ex-employee. What can I do about it?

How SEO is used to spread defamation

Can I write a letter to ask for the web page that contains defamation to be removed from the internet?