Defamation and social media expert lawyers. Best defamation solicitor

Internet Law Specialists Lawyers FREE CALL 0800 612 7211

Recently removed from the internet

Right to be forotten solicitors

Law Society Awards winners. Cohen Davis
What our clients say...
"I followed your advice and it worked!"
“Thank you Ruzina, I followed the advice given about what to say to my internet trolls... Read More...
Contact our super friendly Social Media lawyers today!

Click HERE to Call Free for immediate help! 0800 612 7211

 
Click Here

Every situation is different so by far the best way to find out how to respond to a social media legal issue is to speak to those who are most likely to have dealt with a situation similar to yours.
To find out how you can improve your reputation on the internet simply select one of the easy methods of contacting us.


Please use the form below to contact us.
We will respond as soon as possible.

 

 
 
 
 
 
 
Or you can call us on our free hotline.

FREEPHONE  0800 612 7211

(+) 44 207 183 4 123 from outside the UK.

Or if you prefer you can email us to helpline (at) CohenDavis.co.uk.

TheInternet LawCentre

Remove defamation solicitor

If you or your company are the target of defamatory online publications, read on because our defamation solicitors are likely to have come across a similar defamation removal case to yours already, which they would have cracked for another victim.

Our defamation solicitors have successfully removed defamation from hundreds of websites across the world and have excellent relationships with defamation lawyers in the USA, Canada, Australia and Europe, which means we often achieve speedy and cost effective outcomes for our clients.

Remove defamation solicitor

  • Defamation Claim Against The Police

    The Claimant was the Chairman of the Oriental Fine Arts Academy of London (“OFAAL”), a registered charity. He was a well-regarded community worker and a leader within the Tamil community in England and across Europe. Allegations were made to the police against the Claimant, that he committed fraud. Part of the alleged fraud was that he unlawfully altered an official charity document. Those were false allegations for which the Claimant successfully sued his accusers for defamation.

    Defamation claim against the policeThe Detective Sergeant, who investigated the allegations on behalf of the Metropolitan police wrote an email to the accusers where he said the Claimant abused his position as

    ...

  • What can I say in an online review without risking a claim for defamation?

    Some authors of online reviews about businesses are not aware that in England, when it comes to defamation, the reviewer is liable not just for the word he or she used, but also to innuendo. Innuendo is a hint, or a meaning that once may attribute to the words themselves. It follows, that in defamation cases in England, a reviewer is unlikely to escape liability just because the express words used were not strictly speaking defamatory. What is also important is what readers of the online review understand from reading the review. People’s understanding of a matte often goes beyond the simple words used. Readers of online reviews have learned to read between the lines.

  • Location: United State, California.

    Pages removed from: Facebook.

    Date of removal: 1 May 2014.

    Number of web pages removed: 1.

    Additional information: Our defamation solicitors removed 1 defamatory Facebook Page together with history and referring links from various Facebook accounts on behalf of our client, who works in the entertainment industry and who suffered for many months from defamation on Facebook. 

  •  I have been defamed on the internet. What can I do about this?

    The ability to list web pages on the top page of the search results for a long period of time is normally a function of either excellent workmanship or an unintended  random consequence of Google algorithm. Names of individuals and companies are easy targets for the purpose of internet defamation or even just to cause someone reputational, emotional or financial damage. 

  • You've been dragged through the mud on the internet. Your reputation is being assaulted with vicious lies, and you don't even know who's telling them.

    The situation is urgent, but what should you do? You do a little research but find conflicting advice: Hire an SEO expert! Hire a PR consultant! Talk to someone experienced in e-commerce sales! Get yourself a lawyer.

    The truth is, removing defamation from the internet involves no single magic solution.

    After many years of costly trial and error, here's what I discovered: Only one trick will secure you the best opportunity to remove defamation from the internet from public view, and this trick is called EXPERIENCE. Believe me when I tell you this. I am a lawyer!

    Get your

    ...

  • Questions about defamatory online reviews

    Many people genuinely believe and even insist that review websites are there to enhance consumer’s ability to make the right choice or to educate them in choosing; a reputable supplier, a builder, an estate agent or even a holiday provider - and they are dead wrong. The truth is that the vast majority of those who operate review websites have clever systems that are aimed at benefitting them financially by encouraging visitors to their website to write negative reviews. This is often achieved by attacking and consequently destroying the reputation of good, honest and well established businesses across the UK.

  • Can I obtain an injunction against Google?

    The first UK Google injunction was obtained in 2011 by Yair Cohen.  The order required Google to reveal personal details of individuals who were defaming a UK business on the internet.

    The claimant, who was seeking the injunction against Google was a news publishing group, Wyvern Media, which at the time was servicing tens of thousands of customers each year. Despite Wyvern's genuine attempt to satisfy them all, a small number of customers remained disgruntled.

  • Jurisdiction: United States remove defamation twitter solicitors

    Pages removed from: Twitter

    Date of removal: 20 May 2016

    Number of pages removed: 1

    Additional information: Our client became victim of blackmail on the internet which was carried out on social media by a number of individuals. Our defamation lawyers took swift action to close down a defamatory Twitter account because it was

    ...

  • Defamation by investors - defamation against a company

    In a case that is believed to be the first of its kind in the UK concerning online defamation by investors against a company, online defamation and social media specialist solicitor firm Cohen Davis won damages for its PLC client, a gold mining company Red Rock Resources (RRR) after the company was defamed on social media by one of its small yet vocal investors.

  • Cohen Davis has won in the case of Phipps v Britton an apology and substantial damages from Paul Britton and his company Origin Design Ltd after they defamed, harassed and cyberbullied our client in a series of websites they created about him. This was a case where the victim felt he had been blackmailed on the internet to settle a debt. The apology took the form of a statement in open court read before His Honour Judge Moloney QC on Wednesday 20 May 2015.

    Discovering the identity of internet commentators who post abusive and defamatory content online and who use an anonymous identity to defame you or your business, is often a hugely challenging, if at times impossible task and one that continues to be a global problem for victims of such internet abuse. The police in any jurisdiction will typically be very limited in being able to assist in circumstances of anonymous internet abuse and from

    ...

  • False reviews and other defamatory statements that appear on the internet often leave the targeted business suffocating for cash and investment. Our well polished processes to removing defamatory web pages and forum posts from the internet often gives our clients the kiss of life that saves the business from bankruptcy.

  • Jurisdiction: United States remove defamation ripoffreport solicitors

    Pages removed from: RipOffReport.com

    Date of removal: 6 June 2016

    Number of pages removed: 5

    Additional information: Our client was located in the USA but had substantial business interests in the United Kingdom. First, our client with the help of our US internet law attorneys obtained an injunction in the US to prevent the

    ...

  • remove yelp review

    Many business owners who find themselves victims of the 1 in 5 (acknowledged!) fake reviews on Yelp.com will admit that fake reviews are a business killer.

    So when I first read Yelp.com advice to victims of fake reviewsI thought they were faking it. 

    Fabricated stories that are made to sound credible with loads of ‘detailed information’ about the ‘real experience’ suffered by average Joe whilst shopping at your store/restaurant/office are as common as the name Joe.

    It is now scientifically proven that at least a fifth of

    ...

  • Jurisdiction: United States remove fake business reviews from Google and Money Saving Expert

    Review removed from: MoneySavingExert.co.uk

    Date of removal: 09 February 2017

    Number of pages removed: 1

    Additional information: Our client is a successful director of a small business installing driveways and patios and was subjected to defamation on the internet. The defamation included the creation of a forum where

    ...

  • Are fake reviews legal in the UK?

    Writing a fake online review has never been easier. A fast growing industry of online review ‎websites leaves very little hope to those business owners who want to play it fair. ‎

    The number of fake online reviews is constantly growing. A significant number of fake online ‎reviews are written by business owners who often act in despair after becoming ‎victims of fake online reviews.‎

  • Adverse results from search engines can often have severe consequences, sometimes affecting you as an individual, sometimes affecting your family and at other times affecting your business. This will seem particularly unfair where the information presented by the search engine against your name or the name of your business is untrue, deceptive or very old.

  • Many "webpage removal specialists" offer to remove bad pages from the search results by using search engine optimisation (SEO).

    It is a series of techniques that companies use to try and make their websites appear on the first pages of internet search results.

    It is largely a promotional tool which, if used knowledgeably, can bring almost any business tons of success. SEO is a good medicine to cure marketing problems. But when it comes to a bad and rapidly spreading case of infectious defamation, SEO might be less effective.

    Remember that SEO is a preventative tool. It does not "remove" or "delete" bad search results but only temporarily pushes them down the search results.

    If the information that you wish to remove

    ...

  • Jurisdiction: United States remove defamatory reviews Google dentist

    Reviews removed from: Google Business listings

    Date of removal: 15 June 2017

    Number of reviews removed: 5

    Additional information: Our client is a dental practice with several dental clinics across London. Over a brief period of time our client's Google listings of one of its dental practices has been subjected to 5 highly

    ...

  • Jurisdiction: United Kingdom Stop defamation anonymous unknown source

    Pages removed from: WordPress

    Date of removal: 08 May 2017

    Number of pages removed: 1

    Additional information: Our client, a successful mining company incorporated in Australia, was defamed on the internet. A website was published, containing highly defamatory articles with the intent of causing our client as much damage as possible.

    ...

  • Jurisdiction: United KingdomPistonHeads forum

    Pages removed from: PistonHeads forum

    Date of removal: 15 November 2016

    Number of pages removed: 1 post

    Additional information: Our client was exposed to a campaign of defamation and harassment on the internet. Internet users who would Google the client’s company would be linked to a forum including highly defamatory adjectives. Despite the fact that

    ...

  • Jurisdiction: United States remove fake business reviews from Google and Yell.com

    Review removed from: Yell.com

    Date of removal: 20 December 2016

    Number of pages removed: 1

    Additional information:Our defamation solicitors removed highly defamatory reviews posted on Yell.com on behalf of our client, a successful business owner who owned a national plumbing business and was

    ...

  • Jurisdiction: United States remove fake business reviews from Google

    Review removed from: Google Maps

    Date of removal: 02 May 2017

    Number of pages removed: 1

    Additional information: Our client is a small company that like many in the UK is relying on Google searches to acquire new customers. After our client increase their prices, one of their customers tried to negotiate a discount. When this was

    ...

  • How to respond to defamation on a review website.

    Whether you are the victim of corporate defamation or of individual defamation, before responding to a bad review or to online defamation read this!

    Don't rush it.

    If you are considering writing a response to the defamatory article or to the negative review, then don't rush it.

  • Defamation by an ex-employee. What can I do about it?

    It is not uncommon for disgruntled former employees to go on a campaign of defamation against their former employer’s company.

    The defamation normally occurs through blogs, emails and by initiation of discussion groups in forums aimed at throwing as much dirt as possible at the former employee's company.

  • Jurisdiction: United State, New York.

    Pages removed from: Forum Russian America.com 

    Date of removal: 27 September 2013.

    Number of web pages removed: 50+.

    Additional information: Removed 2 threads. Language: Russian.

  • Jurisdiction: United State, Arizona.remove rip off report lawyers. Remove defamation

    Pages removed from: Rip Off Report.

    Date of removal: 23 October 2013.

    Number of web pages removed: 2.

    Additional information: Removed defamation from RipOffReport. Obtained disclosure orders and identified poster who was subsequently arrested, prosecuted and convicted at Iselworth Crown Court. We

    ...

  • harassment injunction solicitorJurisdiction: United Kingdom.

    Pages removed from: instagram.

    Date of removal: 04 June 2015.

    Number of web pages removed: 75+.

    Additional information: In this case our client, who works in the entertainment industry suffered harassment and abuse on Instagram. We obtained an injunction

    ...

  • Meet Gary. Gary was a small investor in listed public companies who held shares in a gold mining company RRR PLC. As an active investor, Gary used to be involved in online investment forums such as Interactive Investors.

  • How to Prevent Becoming a Victim of Defamation by Former Employees and Partners?

    How to describe that first shocking moment when you discover that the reputation of your business is being tarnished all over the internet? There’s really nothing else like it, and it is followed by sleepless nights and constant worry. For some business people whose reputation is attacked online, things will never be the same again.

    Just imagine: As you lie awake wishing the problem would go away, instead, it is spreading throughout the internet. Within weeks, sometimes even days, there is more defamatory material every time you look.

  • Jurisdiction: United States, remove defamation from google reviews solicitors

    Pages removed from:ScamExposure

    Date of removal: 6 October 2015.

    Number of pages removed:12 reviews.

    Additional information: ScamExposure is a website which is located in the USA and which is known to be used to defame and harass businesses and individuals who are then left with little or no legal recourse to have the

    ...

  • Jurisdiction: United States remove fake business reviews from Google

    Pages removed from: Google

    Date of removal: 26 October 2015

    Number of pages removed: 2

    Additional information: Our client, a professional self-employed person, was subjected to a campaign of defamation and harassment on the internet. The campaign was carried out by competitors who spread lies about our client and about his

    ...

  • Remove business reviews GoogleJurisdiction: United Kingdom

    Pages removed from: Google and Google+

    Date of removal: 11 December 2015

    Number of web pages removed: 2

    Additional information: Our defamation lawyers acted for a national motor repair company. A disgruntled customer defamed our client’s company on the internet and said he

    ...

  • Jurisdiction: United States remove defamation youtube solicitors

    Pages removed from: YouTube.com

    Date of removal: 2 February 2016

    Number of pages removed: 1 video, description and comments

    Additional information: Our client, an international investment company was defamed on the internet by disgruntled investors. This included publishing a highly defamatory video on YouTube, which included defamatory

    ...

  • Jurisdiction: United States remove defamatory reviews Google

    Pages removed from: Google Plus

    Date of removal: 20 October 2015

    Number of pages removed: 2 

    Additional information: Our client, a professional person and a sole trader, was subjected to a campaign of online defamation, possible by competitors who were trying to ruin his business. The campaign included defamatory reviews on Google,

    ...

  • Remove business reviews from HarringayOnlineJurisdiction: United Kingdom

    Pages removed from: www.HarringayOnline.com

    Date of removal: 8 June 2016

    Number of web pages removed: 1

    Additional information: Our client, a party wall surveyor, was subjected to a campaign of harassment on the internet. The campaign included posting

    ...

  • This is business sabotage in the digital age. It is far more common than you might imagine and new enterprises are particularly vulnerable as they are at their weakest. The ‎culprits will normally be more established operators in their ‎sector/field who are seeking to ‘smother them in the cradle’ or ‎perhaps stifle their growth when they begin to feel the ‎effects of the competition on their own business.

    It might also be from established entities who are retaliating ‎to what the incorrectly perceive to be similar behaviour on ‎the part of others. ‎ Restaurants are especially vulnerable to fake reviews. A recent study from Harvard University entitled, "fake it 'till you make it" shows that independent restaurants are much more likely to post fake reviews about their competitors than any other sector. Equally, they are quite fond of making up good ones about themselves.

    ...

  • Jurisdiction: United States remove defamation from wordpress solicitors

    Pages removed from: WordPress

    Date of removal: 20 May 2016

    Number of pages removed: 1

    Additional information: Our client, a successful dairy farmer became victim of defamation by a disgruntled ex-employee who created a blog on WordPress defaming our client by falsely claiming he was being abused as an employee.

    ...

  • Remove defamatory blog legal adviceJurisdiction: France

    Pages removed from: Wordpress Blog

    Date of removal: 22 June 2016

    Number of web pages removed: 1

    Additional information: This website removal concerned a leading offshore investment company, which had fallen victim to a popular defamatory blog which was operated from

    ...

  • Remove defamation TAPAJurisdiction: United Kingdom

    Pages removed from: Tapa.co.uk

    Date of removal: 4 July 2016

    Number of web pages removed: 1

    Additional information: Tapa.co.uk is a website dedicated to exposing alleged advertising "scams" in the UK. Our defamation lawyers were instructed that the website includes a list of

    ...

  • Remove harassing and defamatory threadsJurisdiction: United Kingdom

    Pages removed from: nuisancecalls.org.uk

    Date of removal: 7 April 2016

    Number of web pages removed: 20+

    Additional information: Our defamation and harassment solicitors successfully liaised with the website operators to secure the removal

    ...

  • Remove from Google ICO right to be forgotten applicationJurisdiction: United Kingdom

    Pages removed from: Google searches (Daily Mirror)

    Date of removal: 23 March 2016

    Number of web pages removed:1

    Additional information: Our right to be forgotten lawyers made an application to the Information Commissioner’s

    ...

  • How SEO is used to spread defamation

    Everyone has a soft spot. Being called a certain bad name in public could cause you a lot of damage and harm your career.

    For example, a doctor might be described as "negligent", a solicitor as "incompetent", a builder as a "cowboy", or a teacher as "stupid". Such labels would be regarded by any of these people as a personal attack on their reputation and integrity.

    But perhaps the most harmful insult of all was suffered by a top civil servant who was a social worker for the Children’s Service at a district council in the north of the country.

  • Have you recently suffered defamation by competitors?

    Online defamation by competitors is not unheard of. Below is one classic example of defamation by competitors of a small family business. 

    Jeff Clark, a husband and a father of three children ages 3, 6, and 10, has always loved cars. He has been fixing them since he was 12, and has worked in local garages around the Manchester area for many years.

  • Remove defamation from money saving expert solicitorJurisdiction: United Kingdom.

    Pages removed from: Money Saving Expert.

    Date of removal: 24 March 2014.

    Number of web pages removed: 50+.

    Additional information: 2 offending threads of reviews against a hotel were deleted. Our defamation solicitors facilitated the removal of 2 defamatory threads which contained dozens of defamatory comments against our client, who is the owner of a chain of

    ...

  • How effective should a defamation cease and desist letter be when your aim is to have online defamation removed from a web page, a blog or a forum?

  • It is possible to ease the pain caused by online defamation through principles of tactical transparency. There are numerous examples of organisations that for a period of time suffered sustained attacks on their reputation but nevertheless managed to come out at the end of the dark tunnel cleaner, stronger and loved by their customers.

  • Can I write a letter to ask for the web page that contains defamation to be removed from the internet?

    Online Reputation travels fast and because so many members of the public wrongly believe that they can hide behind a made up name in an online forum to post comments without being accountable for the consequences of their comments, you can see how your business reputation could be completely tarnished almost overnight.

  • Jurisdiction: United States, remove defamation from google reviews solicitors

    Pages removed from: Google reviews

    Date of removal: 2 October 2015.

    Number of pages removed: 2 reviews.

    Additional information: Our defamation solicitors removed a 2 highly defamatory reviews from Google reviews (Google Plus) by communicating with Google. No legal action was required. The reviews were removed on behalf of a

    ...

  • Jurisdiction: United State, remove defamation from weebly solicitor

    Pages removed from: Weebly

    Date of removal: 04 May 2015.

    Number of pages removed: 2 websites.

    Additional information: Our defamation solicitors removed 2 defamatory and harassing websites that targeted our client, a former senior United Nation employee. Our lawyers obtained an injunction against the creator of the websites and had the

    ...

  • Jurisdiction: United State, California.Remove defamation from google blogger solicitor

    Pages removed from: Blogger.

    Date of removal: 21 May 2015.

    Number of web pages removed: 2.

    Additional information: Our defamation solicitors removed reviews from Blogger as well as remove unlawfully obtained image of our client. The allegations on Blogger were highly defamatory suggesting our client was involved in deception

    ...

  • Defamation solicitor to remove defamation from estateagenttodayJurisdiction: United Kingdom.
    Defamation removed from: EstateAgentToday.

    Date of removal: 29 May 2015.

    Number of web pages removed: 25.

    Additional information: We removed defamatory posts from this UK based website, EstateAgentToday on behalf of a high street law firm. A number of lawyers were defamed on EstateAgentToday by posts and comments in relation to property transactions and the quality of the work and services they allegedly delivered.

    ...

  • Jurisdiction: United State, California.delete defamation from blogger solicitor

    Pages removed from: Blogger.

    Date of removal: 22 July 2015.

    Number of web pages removed: 2.

    Additional information: Our defamation solicitors removed defamation and private information from Blogger, a blogging platform that is operated by Google. We have successfully requested the removal of the entire blog from the internet on the basis that the information it

    ...

  • Jurisdiction: United State, California.Remove reviews from google plus solicitor

    Pages removed from: Google Plus.

    Date of removal: 23 July 2015.

    Number of web pages removed: 7.

    Additional information: Our defamation solicitors remove reviews from Google Plus on behalf of our client who is a letting agent and who had had a large number of defamatory reviews posted about his business.    

    ...

  • Jurisdiction: United State, San Francisco.Remove defamation from yelp solicitor

    Pages removed from: Yelp.

    Date of removal: 29 July 2015.

    Number of web pages removed: 1.

    Additional information: Our solicitors successfully facilitated the deletion of a defamatory reviews published on Yelp.co.uk on behalf of our client, an estate agency who operates nationally. The fake review on Yelp had caused substantial loss

    ...

  • Jurisdiction: United Kingdom
    Pages removed from: Paydayloansdigest.com

    Date of removal: 05 August 2015.

    Number of web pages removed: 1.

    Additional information: Our defamation solicitors remove a defamatory post from Paydayloansdigest on behalf of our client, a former executive in the so called Payday industry.  

  • defamation solicitor remove defamation from brentfordtw Jurisdiction: United Kingdom

    Pages removed from: Studentlandlorder.com

    Date of removal: 14 August 2015 .

    Number of web pages removed: 3.

    Additional information: Our defamation solicitors facilitated the removal of 3 defamatory reviews posted on

    ...

  • Jurisdiction: United State, New York.Remove defamation from google blogger solicitor

    Pages removed from: Muckrack.com.

    Date of removal: 21 August 2015.

    Number of web pages removed: 1.

    Additional information: Our defamation solicitors removed a defamatory post from Muckrack.com which included an unauthorised image of our client. 

  • Jurisdiction: United State, Californiaright to be forgotten solicitor removal from searches

    Pages removed from: Google searches

    Date of removal: 07 October 2015

    Number of search results removed from Google: 2

    Additional information: Our defamation solicitors removed 2 search results from Google searches in relation to 14 search phrases. 

      

    ...

  • Jurisdiction: United State, remove defamation from weebly solicitor

    Pages removed from: ComplaintsBoard

    Date of removal: 15 September 2015.

    Number of pages removed: 21 pages.

    Additional information: Our defamation solicitors removed 21 defamatory posts against our client's business from ComplaintsBoard. Our lawyers worked with Google to have those pages completely removed from searches within and outside

    ...

  • Jurisdiction: United States, remove defamation from weebly solicitor

    Pages removed from: Blogger

    Date of removal: 25 September 2015.

    Number of pages removed: 1 post and 4 images.

    Additional information: Our defamation solicitors removed a post and 5 highly defamatory comments as well as images of our client from a Blogger based website. The defamation was removed by the blogger following negotiations with

    ...

  • Jurisdiction: United States, remove defamation ripoff report solicitors

    Pages removed from: RipOffReport.

    Date of removal: 6 October 2015.

    Number of pages removed: 6 reports.

    Additional information: RipOffReport is a website located in the USA and which which is notorious for being difficult to have defamation removed from. In this case, our client, a property investment company who was defamed on

    ...

  • It is estimated by researchers that between 16 to 20 per cent of social media reviews are fake. We believe however that the real number is much higher.

    We believe that between 50 to 65 per cent of all online reviews are fake.

    A research by Harvard Business School entitled“Fake It Till You Make It: Reputation, Competition, and Yelp Review Fraud 24 September 2013” points to an emerging industry of fake review creation, which is primarily being driven by business owners who either leave positive reviews for themselves, negative reviews for their competitors or a combination of both.

  • Internet defamation, is becoming more and more a survival issue for a growing number of individuals and organisations across the UK.

    In most cases where we are instructed to remove defamation from the internet, we do so successfully and without putting our clients through expensive litigation. In most cases we can facilitate the removal of defamatory web pages through an affordable, yet persuasive Cease and Desist letter or by negotiations.

    Even if the offending website is located outside the jurisdiction of the English Courts, a well drafted letter might still be sufficient to have the defamatory content removed.

    However, more and more internet service providers such as Google and Bing ask for a court order before they agree to remove defamation from their

    ...

  • Review websites are either Industry Specific or Multi Area. They create an image of a service for the public good whilst in fact, they are commercial enterprises, they are not altruistic. Their commodity is YOUR reputation, and it's free of charge. Review websites often claim to have a right to publish without responsibility for content. This claim is false; in many cases operators of review websites are also the publishers and often the editors of the posts and are therefore liable to you for defamation.

  • When was the last time you searched online for information about ‎your own company? If the answer to this question is ‎‎“never” then you are not alone. But you also need to read on…‎

    Many organisations spend little or no time in researching ‎themselves on the internet. This makes sense on the face of ‎it; what could you possibly learn that you don’t already ‎know? ‎But it is precisely this subconscious dismissal of the notion ‎that you could find something out that you don’t already ‎know that enables negative ‘information’ from going ‎undetected for so long and causing so much damage.

  • Online reputation attacks can be significantly more powerful when videos are used to attack someone’s reputation. Google, which owns YouTube, appears to be pushing hard to include video posts in its search results. If there is an available video match to a specific search term, it is likely that this video will score highly in the search terms and make its way to the top page of the search results.

    Google aims to offer those who use its search engine a variety of information types, including regular web pages, blogs, social networks, videos, and images.

  • review centre fake reviewsReview Centre is one of the largest and most influential business review websites in the UK. Unfortunately, many reviews on ReviewCentre are fake with the majority being posted by or on behalf of competitors. The likelihood of us being able to facilitate the removal of fake and defamatory online reviews from ReviewCentre is high and to date all our attempts have been sucessfull.

  • Jurisdiction: United State, California.right to be forgotten solicitor

    Pages removed from: Google searches

    Date of removal: 09 December 2014.

    Number of search results removed from Google: 2.

    Additional information: We applied to Google for Right to be forgotten. Our client was the victim of a criminal campaign of stalking and harassment which had a sever mental affect on her and the family. The online blog

    ...

  • Jurisdiction: United Kingdon.
    Pages removed from: Gaydar.com

    Date of removal: 25 June 2015.

    Number of web pages removed: 1.

    Additional information: Our defamation solicitors removed private information from gay porn website, Gaydar. The defamation was posted by unknown users against our client who was targeted for unknown reasons.  Our defamation solicitors communicated with the website operators and successfully removed the personal information from the website.

  • solicitor to remove defamation from moneysavingexpertJurisdiction: United Kingdom.

    Pages removed from: Money Saving Expert.

    Date of removal: 03 April 2014.

    Number of web pages removed: 2.

    Additional information: Our defamation solicitors removed 2 defamatory threads from Money Saving Expert website. The user's comments were particularly harmful and were posted over a period of more than 2

    ...

  • solicitor to remove defamation from tycoon system websiteJurisdiction: United Kingdom
    Pages removed from: The Independent online.

    Date of removal: 17 March 2015.

    Number of web pages removed: 

    Additional information: Resolved issue of inaccurate reporting of court proceedings from the Independent Online on behalf of our client, a prominent heart surgeon. Often misreporting by main stream media requires careful negotiations to facilitate a satisfactory outcome for our clients. Most of our clients prefer to resolve

    ...

  • Remove review from trustpilot solicitorJurisdiction: Denmark

    Pages removed from: TrustPilot.

    Date of removal: 01 August 2014.

    Number of web pages removed: 2.

    Additional information: Our defamation solicitors facilitated the removal of a defamatory reviews from TrustPilot. Our client, a successful online retailer was unable to facilitate the removal of the

    ...

  • Defamation solicitor to remove defamation from estdulwich Jurisdiction: United Kingdom.
    Defamation removed from: EastDulwich Forum.

    Date of removal: 29 April 2015.

    Number of web pages removed: 7.

    Additional information: Our defamation solicitors removed defamatory posts from this UK based website, EastDulwich Forum on behalf of our client who became victim of a campaign of defamation and harassment on the internet. 

  • defamation solicitor remove defamation from brentfordtw Jurisdiction: United Kingdom

    Pages removed from: BrentfordTW8.com

    Date of removal: 13 July 2015.

    Number of web pages removed: 1.

    Additional information: Our defamation solicitors facilitated the removal of defamatory posts from BrentfordTW8. All the defamatory posts were

    ...

  • Jurisdiction: United State, Texas.

    Pages removed from: Economics Job Market Rumors. 

    Date of removal: 13 March 2014.

    Number of web pages removed: 30+.

    Additional information: Our defamation solicitors removed 3 threads on behalf of our client, who is a prominent UK academic.  

  • Jurisdiction: Romania.remove defamation from Cyclex solicitor
    Pages removed from: Cylex-UK.

    Date of removal: 02 June 2015.

    Number of web pages removed: 1.

    Additional information: Our defamation solicitors removed defamatory reviews and comments  from Manchester Cylex. The defamation was posted by unknown uses against our client who works in the entertainment industry.  Our defamation solicitors communicated with the website operators who are based in Romania.

  • solicitor to remove defamation from tycoon system websiteJurisdiction: United Kingdom
    Pages removed from: Tycoon System.

    Date of removal: 05 May 2015.

    Number of web pages removed: 1.

    Additional information: Our defamation solicitors remove a defamatory review from TycoonSystem on behalf of a law firm from Essex, UK. The defamatory review was posted by an unknown user which meant the solicitor, subject of the defamatory review was unable to investigate the matter alleged or to respond to the defamatory review in any

    ...

  • solicitor to remove defamation from law society gazetteJurisdiction: United Kingdom.

    Pages removed from: Law Society Gazette.

    Date of removal: 26 February 2015.

    Number of web pages removed: 12.

    Additional information: Our solicitors removed from the Law Society Gazette user comments which were posted in response to an editorial article. The defamatory comments referred to our client, a

    ...

  • Location: United State, New York.

    Pages removed from: Forex Peace Army Forum. Global FX Management Trading Ltd.

    Date of removal: 28 November 2013.

    Number of web pages removed: 5. 

    Additional information: Our defamation solicitors removed 1 offending thread on behalf of our client and international FX company. 

  • Location: United State, California.

    Pages removed from: Wordpress . com . Automattic

    Date of removal: 04 December 2013.

    Number of web pages removed: 2. 

    Additional information: 1 website shut down. 

  • Location: United State, California.

    Pages removed from: ebay.

    Date of removal: 24 October 2013.

    Number of web pages removed: 2.

    Additional information: 2 negative feedback removed.

  • Jurisdiction: United Kingdom.

    Pages removed from: Case Warriors.com.

    Date of removal: 21 November 2013.

    Number of web pages removed: 30 +.

    Additional information: Our defamation lawyers removed 2 offending thread.

  • Jurisdiction: United State, Virginia.

    Pages removed from: IPetitions. Tigger LLC.

    Date of removal: 04 April 2014.

    Number of web pages removed: 1.

    Additional information: Removed 1 petition + 9 comments.  

  • Jurisdiction: United State, California.remove defamation from blogger solicitor

    Pages removed from: Blogger.

    Date of removal: 14 April 2014.

    Number of web pages removed: 1.

    Additional information: Removed 1 post + 3 live links by application of our defamation solicitors to Google .  

  • Remove defamation solicitor web.comLocation: United States, Atlanta.

    Pages removed from: Webs.com. 

    Date of removal: 27 April 2014.

    Number of web pages removed: 10+.

    Additional information: Our defamation solicitors acted for a client from the entertainment industry who suffered from defamation on the internet. 1 Website shut down.

  • Location: Germany.

    Pages removed from: Tycoon System.com.

    Date of removal: 23 September 2013.

    Number of web pages removed: 20+

    Additional information: Our defamation solicitors removed 2 threads from this website. In this project our social media and internet lawyers acted for a large international property investment company. Our client become the subject of hundreds of defamatory forum comments which were largely posted by

    ...

  • Jurisdiction: United State, Maryland.Remove defamation teacher

    Pages removed from: Outofthedark.com

    Date of removal: 23 September 2014.

    Number of web pages removed: 1.

    Additional information: Our defamation solicitors removed 6 posts from this website. Under a right to be forgotten. In this project our social media lawyers removed from UK and European Google search results references to

    ...

  • remove defamation from horse and hound solicitorLocation: United States, Missouri.

    Pages removed from: HorseandHound. Savvis.

    Date of removal: 03 May 2014.

    Number of web pages removed: 10+.

    Additional information: Our defamation solicitors removed 2 dedicated threads on behalf our our client who is a national horse breeder. 

  • Remove defamation from propertytribes legal adviceJurisdiction: United Kingdom.

    Pages removed from: Property Tribes.

    Date of removal: 03 April 2014.

    Number of web pages removed: 10+.

    Additional information: 1 defamatory thread. Our defamation solicitors removed  large thread of defamatory posts against our client, an international property agent. 

  • Jurisdiction: United State, California.Remove defamation from wordpress solicitor

    Pages removed from: Automattic WoredPress.com.

    Date of removal: 31 March 2014.

    Number of web pages removed: 10+.

    Additional information: Part of 1 thread deleted. Our defamation solicitors removed defamatory comments which were posted on WordPress in relation to our client's international property letting business. 

  • Jurisdiction: Canada.

    Pages removed from: Vertical Scope.

    Date of removal: 28 April 2014.

    Number of web pages removed: 1.

    Additional information: 1 comment deleted. Our defamation solicitors removed a highly defamatory thread from this website which operated by Vertical Scope in Canada. The defamation removed was in relation to our client's business as a national dog breeder. 

  • Location: United Kingdom.

    Pages removed from: ReviewCentre.

    Date of removal: 19 November 2013.

    Number of web pages removed: 6.

    Additional information: 1 thread deleted. Our defamation solicitors facilitated the removal of a defamatory thread from ReviewCentre. The defamatory thread had caused substantial amount of financial damage to our clients, a leading national property management agency. 

  • Jurisdiction: United State, California.Remove defamation from Blogger solicitors

    Pages removed from: Blogger.

    Date of removal: 24 March 2014.

    Number of web pages removed: 2.

    Additional information: Our defamation solicitors persuaded Google to delete 2 blog post from Blooger which is operated by Gooogle. 

  • remove defamation from rarenyheter solicitorJurisdiction: Belgium.

    Pages removed from: Rare nyheter.

    Date of removal: 9 April 2014.

    Number of web pages removed: 50+.

    Additional information: 1 thread. Our client was a target of a campaign of harassment of defamation on this website. Our defamation solicitors removed the defamation without having to issue actual legal proceedings.  

  • Jurisdiction: United State, California.

    Pages removed from: Google Autocomplete/Google search.

    Date of removal: 17 March 2014.

    Number of web pages removed: 10+.

    Additional information: Our defamation lawyers removed 10 search phrase from Google Autocomplete. 13 Additional offending web pages de-indexed from Google searches. The autocomplete referred internet users to defamatory search results against our client, a prominent academic. Google

    ...
Speak to a defamation lawyer today!

Value packed social media legal advice
Defamation removal letter

How to write an effective defamation removal letter
Unmasking Internet Trolls

How to expose internet trolls
A right to be forgotten appeal

A right to be forgotten appeal to ICO
Search the entire site
Is Yelp.com faking it?

When I first read Yelp.com advice to victims of fake reviews I thought they were faking it.  Read More
Remove private information from the internet
Latest Posts
Our work featured on

    Internet defamation lawguardian remove images from the internet Amazon specialist lawyer
Our clients speak out
"Great team, great people! God bless you all, Thank you!"
"I don't know if you have the real notion of what just happened! You guys have helped me... Read More...
"Thank you and your team so very much for giving us our...
“I would like to very deeply thank Yair, Louise and Adam for giving my family, in... Read More...
"a big thank you to Yair, yourself and anyone else whom...
“I would like to say a big thank you to Yair, yourself and anyone else whom worked on... Read More...
"They actually genuinely care about the outcome"
"More or less out of the blue, my livelihood was threatened from a very unexpected... Read More...
"guidance is beyond the value of any fees paid"
“Thank you for everything you have done so far, your assistance and guidance is far... Read More...
"Excellent service"
“Thank you Yair for an excellent service. Your attention to detail and approachable... Read More...

a flat out uncond

harassment injunction

How to serve an harassment injunction via social media

 
Internet Law Blog
A Google Bomb - Live Example
What is a Google bomb? The phrase Google bomb is used to describe various practices and techniques aimed to "marry" two or more... Read More...
Harassment injunctions against anonymous internet users
Watch how harassment solicitor serves for the first time ever an harassment injunction against anonymous online user via the... Read More...
How to Remove False and Defamatory Reviews
Questions about defamatory online reviews Many people genuinely believe and even insist that review websites are there to... Read More...