Defamation and social media expert lawyers. Best defamation solicitor

Internet Law Specialist Lawyers FREE CALL 0800 612 7211

Yair Cohen Lawyer of the Year Award.jpg

What our clients say...
"The outcome has been very satisfactory"
"I have been very pleased with the services provided by Cohen Davis. Their team have... Read More...
Contact our super friendly Social Media lawyers today!

Click HERE to Call Free for immediate help! 0800 612 7211

 

Every situation is different so by far the best way to find out how to respond to a social media legal issue is to speak to those who are most likely to have dealt with a situation similar to yours.
To find out how you can improve your reputation on the internet simply select one of the easy methods of contacting us.

 
Please use the form below to contact us.
We will respond as soon as possible.

 

 
 
 
 
 
 
Or you can call us on our free hotline.

FREEPHONE  0800 612 7211

(+) 44 207 183 4 123 from outside the UK.

Or if you prefer you can email us to helpline (at) CohenDavis.co.uk.

TheInternet LawCentre

Cross jurisdiction harassment

Cross jurisdiction harassment

How to stop a UK harasser from harassing someone in another country

Online harassment often occurs across a number of jurisdictions. There are special legal issues for successfully handling online harassment, when the harasser lives in England and the victim of the harassment lives in another country.

Example of cross border online harassment

Harassment where the harasser lives in England and the victim lives overseas

Cease and desist letter for harassment in England

Lawyer's thoughts about the case

Example of cross border online harassment

Our client Gerald (not his real name) was a married man who most of the time lived in Hong Kong. Previously, he lived and studied in England and at the end of his studies, he went back to his home country. For a period of nearly 4 years, Gerald was subjected to a campaign of harassment and defamation by an individual from the UK, with whom he previously had a friendship.

The friendship ended once the individual developed feelings for our client, which our client rejected. The harasser developed an obsession with our client which triggered the campaign of harassment and defamation against him. The campaign of harassment included publications of defamatory allegations and private information on the internet such as branding our client as a cheat, manipulator, abuser, and liar.

Our client also received repeated unwanted phone calls, text and telephone messages to him, to his family and to his place of work. The harasser regularly posted defamatory allegations about our client on a public Facebook group and occasionally sent defamatory emails to our client’s employers. The campaign of harassment was also a huge intrusion into our client’s private and family life and it caused enormous distress and harm to him and his family. Having read an article on our website about how to stop a stalker, Gerald contacted our firm in desperation for help. 

Cross-Border Online Harassment Legal Advice FAQ

If you're in a different country from your harasser, you can still take legal action. It's important to determine whether you can bring proceedings in the harasser's country. In the case of England, you'd need to have sufficient links to the UK, which could mean living there or visiting often, as the impact of the harassment must occur within the English jurisdiction.

Yes, a cease and desist letter, or a harassment notice, can be very effective. Serving this notice to the harasser in England can lead to an acknowledgment of the harassing behaviour, the removal of harassing content, and even a written apology and legally binding undertaking to cease the harassment.

Jurisdiction in harassment cases is usually based on the victim's location. For defamation, it may be decided by convenience for the defendant, and for breach of privacy, it could be where the breach occurred. If the breach is online, cases can often be brought in England as the content is accessible there.

The double actionability rule allows you to bring a case in one jurisdiction if the case would likely succeed in the jurisdiction where the damage occurred. This means that even if the victim is overseas, they can bring a defamation case in England if the harm to their reputation would be actionable in both places.

Legal action for breach of privacy and the misuse of private information, in addition to defamation and harassment, can ensure that a case will be heard in England, even if the victim lives elsewhere. This is because English courts can make effective orders against the individuals or entities within its jurisdiction.

Harassment where the harasser lives in England and the victim lives overseas

Sometimes, in harassment cases, the harasser is from England, whilst the victim lives in another country. The question is whether the victim who lives in another country, can bring legal proceedings in England against their English harasser. In order to bring legal proceedings for harassment in England, the victim must have sufficient links to the UK.

Sufficient links to the UK means that the victim either lives in the UK or visits the country often. The reason for this, is that the damage to the victim, the distress and apprehension must happen within the English jurisdiction. What matters in harassment cases, in terms of jurisdiction, is not where the harasser is located, but rather the location of the victim at the time the harassment victim suffers from the harassment. In defamation cases, the location of the victim matters less because the question of the most appropriate jurisdiction to decide a defamation case can be determined by the convenience to the defendant.

In cases of breach of privacy, or the misuse of private information, the jurisdiction may be decided by where the breach occurred. If the breach occurred online, in most cases, the case for breach of privacy can be brought in England, because what is online is can be seen within the English jurisdiction.

It is therefore advisable, whenever possible, in cases of harassment, where the harasser lives in England and the victim lives overseas, to also bring legal action for breach of privacy and the misuse of private information, as well as legal action for defamation. This will ensure that the case will be heard in England, regardless of where the victim lives.

Cease and desist letter for harassment in England

Often, the quickest and the most effective way to stop a campaign of harassment, where the victim lives abroad whilst the harasser lives in England, is to serve a letter of claim on the harasser. In the case of our client Gerald, the first action we took was to locate the harasser within the English jurisdiction.

Once the harasser was located, he received a harassment notice, which is a document akin to a cease and desist letter. Following personal service of the harassment notice, the harasser acknowledged her harassing conduct, she removed all the harassing content from the internet and provided a written apology to our client. She also provided a legally binding undertaking to never repeat her harassing conduct against our client.

We then placed the case under the seal of the court, which gave the legal settlement the stamp of approval of the court. Any breach of the harasser obligation under the settlement, will from now on be considered in similar terms of a breach of a court order.

Lawyer's thoughts about the case

What made this project particularly challenging was the need to overcome the jurisdiction issues. Where the client was in Hong Kong and the individual was in England, we had to deal with the difficult jurisdictional issues relating to all claims including that for Defamation and Harassment. As far as a claim in defamation is concerned, we were able to rely upon the basis of the double actionability rule.

The double actionability rule is a legal doctrine that says that you can bring a case in one jurisdiction, provided the case would likely be successful in the jurisdiction where the damage to the claimant occurred.

This was particularly challenging because there is a High Court authority to the effect that there cannot be a claim in harassment unless the victim (our client) is within the jurisdiction. However, this is a strict approach, and in reality, the Court in England and Wales is the only one that can make an effective order against the individual. From the outset, we also had to consider whether there was a potential to make an urgent injunction application to stop the individual from publishing further statements on the internet.

Given the high threshold for this type of application, and the absence of any clear threat of blackmail and/or to disclose private information we formed the view that the most effective way to address the individuals conduct is to issue and serve proceedings against her, seeking damages and an injunction in defamation and harassment.

Often, with cases such as this, time is of the essence, which means we must work on the matter urgently before the harasser is given time to escalate the harassment campaign. While our client was prepared to pursue his claim as far as trial (and scope to obtain judgment at an earlier stage) he was extremely satisfied that we were able to resolve this matter through negotiations with the individual.

Remove fake online reviews
Defamation and social media
Search the entire site
 

Follow on Twitter

Signature cases

Our work featured on

Latest Articles

Reputation attack on business

Online defamation

Defamation on a review website
Defamation by competitors legal advice
Defamation by investors legal advice