Defamation and social media expert lawyers. Best defamation solicitor

Internet Law Specialist Lawyers FREE CALL 0800 612 7211

Recently removed from the internet
What our clients say...
"I recommend!"
"The service from Cohen Davis was value for money and I would like to recommend the firm... Read More...
Contact our super friendly Social Media lawyers today!

Click HERE to Call Free for immediate help! 0800 612 7211


Every situation is different so by far the best way to find out how to respond to a social media legal issue is to speak to those who are most likely to have dealt with a situation similar to yours.
To find out how you can improve your reputation on the internet simply select one of the easy methods of contacting us.

Please use the form below to contact us.
We will respond as soon as possible.


Or you can call us on our free hotline.

FREEPHONE  0800 612 7211

(+) 44 207 183 4 123 from outside the UK.

Or if you prefer you can email us to helpline (at)

TheInternet LawCentre

How to remove video posted by paedophile hunters vigilante

How to remove a video posted by a vigilante group

What to do if a vigilante group posted videos about you online

The rise in vigilante groups, assuming police duties and leveraging the widespread use of internet videos, has led to people facing various online reputation problems. This article explores the urgency of seeking legal advice if you become a target of such a vigilante group.

Table of content

The case of John who was entrapped and hunted by a vigilante group

Legal advice on removing defamatory videos from the internet

Can videos of real life be defamatory

What to do if a video contains false allegations about you is posted online

Infringement of GDPR in defamatory videos

How to remove defamatory videos from social media

Solicitor’s thoughts on the case

The case of John who was entrapped and hunted by a vigilante group

Our client, John, (not his real name) was a successful businessman based in London. His life took a dramatic turn when he became the target self-appointed "paedophile-hunters". An unfortunate series of events began when John, seeking companionship during his extended work-from-home period, engaged with a dating site, for the first time in his life. There, he interacted with a number of profiles, all of whom, he assumed, were genuinely searching for a suitable companionship. 

John began engaging in conversation with one paritcular individual, and after weeks of texting, she mentioned thst she might be younger than he thought. In his mind, John believed that the woman was being playful so he played along. During their interaction, she suggested they met up for a coffee in a public place which John was very pleased to do. However, upon arriving at the meeting location, John was confronted by a hostile group of vigilantes.

They filmed him without his consent and falsely named him in public as a paedophile. In the UK, such vigilante groups have no legal authority to entrap, interrogate, or confront individuals under suspicion of criminal activities. In John's case, they misused a fabricated adult profile to erroneously label him as a paedophile. They then posted a film to YouTube featuring John and their interrogation of him upon his arrival at the public place.

Legal advice on removing defamatory videos from the internet

The subsequent events were catastrophic for John, prompting him to seek legal advice. The video of John that the group had posted, began to have a real impact on his life almost immediately. One of the videos were supposedly showing him being apprehended by the vigilante group and being apologetic.

His words were edited and taken out of context to create the impression that he admitted to have sought the companion of a young person. The video, shared across various social media platforms, constituted a severe breach of John's right to fair processing of his data, breach of his privacy and defamation. Despite having never committed a crime in his life, John was unjustly subjected to what amounted to a public trial by what he considered a mob, who knew nothing about him or the real circumstances under which he was entrapped.

Until this incident, he had been considered by everyone who knew him to be a person of upstanding character and integrity. The fallout from the video's release was profound. Despite the unwavering support of some of his friends and family, John descended into depression, overwhelmed by the false accusations. When John approached our law firm, our solicitors, seasoned in handling such cases, swiftly grasped the gravity of the situation. They took prompt action to assist John, successfully facilitating the removal of all the videos from the internet. It is important in these cases to act promptly and certainly before a video is being copied to websites all over the world, where the removal process could be far more challenging.

Can videos of real life be defamatory

Videos depicting real-life events can still fall under the category of defamation, a principle firmly rooted in English law, which places significant emphasis on the context of publication. This legal perspective acknowledges that the defamatory potential of a video is not solely determined by the factual accuracy of the footage itself but also by the manner in which it is shared and the narrative it is embedded within. For instance, a video that is factually accurate can be portrayed in a misleading way through selective editing, accompanying commentary, or presentation in a context that alters its original meaning. Such manipulations can skew the viewer's perception, potentially leading to defamatory outcomes.

The essence of defamation in this context is to assess whether the video, considering the circumstances of its presentation, is capable of diminishing the esteem in which the subject is held by the average person. This involves considering if the video could make the subject appear in a less favorable light, exposing them to ridicule, hatred, or contempt.

English defamation law looks beyond the mere content of the video to evaluate the implications of its distribution and the narrative constructed around it. This nuanced approach underscores the complexity of defamation law, highlighting that even truthful representations of events can be manipulated to defame, depending on how they are framed and presented to the public.

In a nutshell

John's Entrapment and Legal Battle

The case of John: John, a London businessman, was falsely accused by vigilante paedophile-hunters after engaging on a dating site. Misled into meeting, he was filmed without consent and accused publicly on social media.

Legal advice and action: Seeking legal advice, John's solicitors acted promptly to remove the defamatory videos, addressing defamation, privacy breaches, and GDPR violations.

Defamation in real-life videos: English law recognises the defamation potential of real-life videos, focusing on misleading contexts rather than just factual accuracy.

Removing defamatory videos: Strategic legal demands led to the video's removal from social media and search engines, highlighting the need for swift action.

Impact and recovery: The ordeal deeply affected John's mental well-being and reputation, but successful legal intervention provided relief and began the restoration process.

Ultimate goal: The case underscores the importance of expert legal assistance in defending against online defamation and restoring victims' rights and dignity.

What to do if a video contains false allegations about you is posted online

If you find yourself the target of false allegations in a video posted online, it's imperative to take immediate action by seeking legal counsel. Engaging with a legal expert not only offers the potential to address and resolve the issue swiftly, often within just a few hours or days, but also provides a strategic advantage in navigating the complex web of digital content dissemination.

The digital realm's nature, where content can be rapidly shared and replicated, underscores the urgency of quick action. Once a video is online, its potential to be copied and spread across an array of websites and video platforms around the world is vast, making early intervention crucial. The initial steps following the discovery of such a video should involve documenting the content, noting where it has been posted, and any evidence of its spread. This documentation can be invaluable in legal proceedings or when requesting the removal of the content from platforms. A solicitor specialising in defamation, privacy, or internet law can provide guidance on the most effective course of action.

This may include sending cease and desist letters to the individual or entity responsible for posting the video, contacting the platforms hosting the video to request its removal under their policies or applicable laws, and if necessary, pursuing legal action to seek damages or a formal retraction. The challenge in these situations is not only the technical aspect of removing the content from various platforms but also managing the reputational damage that can occur in the interim.

A legal expert can also advise on strategies for reputation management and potentially work with digital reputation management firms to mitigate the negative impact of the false allegations. Given the ease with which digital content can be disseminated and the lasting impact it can have on an individual's reputation, taking decisive and informed action is paramount. The goal is not just the removal of the false content but also, where possible, restoring one's reputation and ensuring a measure of accountability for those who spread falsehoods online.

For anyone who finds themselves in the unfortunate position of being targeted by defamatory videos online, prompt legal intervention is crucial. Seeking legal advice at the earliest opportunity is the most effective step towards safeguarding your reputation, mental well-being, and future prospects. Our legal team collaborates closely with clients to ensure the expedient removal of such harmful content. We understand the urgency and sensitivity of these matters and are dedicated to providing the necessary support and expertise to navigate these challenging situations. By taking immediate action, you can mitigate the potential long-term effects of online defamation and start the process of restoring your personal and professional standing.

Infringement of GDPR in defamatory videos

The increase in personal data breaches via unauthorised disclosures, particularly in the context of online video publications, underscores a significant GDPR compliance issue. The General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) sets strict guidelines for the handling of personal data, as outlined in Article 5.1 (a, b, d), emphasising the need for data to be processed lawfully, fairly, and transparently. It also stipulates that personal data should be collected for specified, explicit, and legitimate purposes and kept accurate and up to date. In the scenario involving John, our team of specialised solicitors achieved the removal of a defamatory video from several internet platforms, including major ones like Facebook, Twitter, and Google.

The video's unauthorised filming and distribution infringed upon John's reasonable expectation of privacy by sharing his personal data without consent. This act constituted a direct violation of Article 5 of the UK GDPR, which demands that personal data be processed with adherence to principles of fairness, transparency, and accuracy. This infringement highlights a critical aspect of GDPR: the regulation not only protects personal data from misuse but also provides individuals with a framework to challenge and rectify situations where their data rights are compromised.

In cases like John's, the GDPR serves as a powerful tool in addressing and mitigating the damages caused by unauthorised data processing activities, including the dissemination of defamatory content. It underscores the importance of vigilance and prompt legal action in protecting personal data and maintaining digital privacy in the face of growing online vulnerabilities.

How to remove defamatory videos from social media

The defamatory video was successfully removed through the diligent and strategic efforts of our solicitors at Cohen Davis. Their approach was multifaceted, combining legal actions based on defamation, GDPR violations, breaches of privacy, and data protection laws. By directly engaging with the website operators hosting the video, our solicitors issued comprehensive legal demands for its removal. These demands were meticulously crafted to cover various legal grounds, highlighting not only the defamation aspect but also the breach of GDPR, privacy, and data protection regulations.

The website operators, upon receiving our GDPR Notice in addition to detailed legal communications, acted promptly to take down the video. In addition to direct communication with website operators, our team strategically appealed to Google, requesting the de-listing of the video from its search results. This request was underpinned by a robust argument that there was no public interest in the video, especially as John was not being investigated by the police. The focus was on alleviating the unjust consequences John faced due to the video's distribution, drawing attention to the broader implications of privacy and data protection alongside defamation.

The video's removal from the internet provided John with tremendous relief and served to rehabilitate his public image, affirming his innocence in the absence of any valid public interest in the content. John expressed his deep gratitude for the discreet, non-judgmental, and wholeheartedly dedicated service of our solicitors.

Their commitment to confidentiality and their attentive support were instrumental in resolving this distressing issue. This case highlights the importance of swift, expert legal intervention in online defamation cases, leveraging a comprehensive legal strategy that addresses defamation alongside GDPR, privacy, and data protection concerns. By removing the defamatory content, our team not only restored John's reputation but also underscored the importance of upholding justice in the digital age, providing him with peace of mind and closure.

Solicitor’s thoughts on the case

Incidents involving false accusations of serious crimes like paedophilia can profoundly impact individuals, often leaving lasting scars. The situation becomes even more distressing when such accusations are made online. The pervasive nature of the internet ensures that individuals are constantly faced with these allegations, repeatedly encountering them in various online spaces, creating a sense of inescapability and constant reminder of their ordeal. This can lead to feelings of isolation, helplessness, and a loss of control over one's public image and personal life.

In John's case, this was particularly true. The online dissemination of false accusations against him marked an incredibly challenging period in his life. The persistent online presence of these allegations exacerbated his distress, affecting his mental well-being, social relationships, and professional standing. Fortunately, our team at Cohen Davis Solicitors were well-equipped to handle John's case, thanks to our extensive experience in similar situations.

Our prior encounters with cases involving online defamation and false accusations gave us the insight needed to develop an effective strategy for John. We understood the urgency and sensitivity required in addressing his situation and were committed to swiftly implementing a plan to facilitate the removal of the defamatory content. We were gratified to successfully navigate the challenges posed by John's case. The removal of the content not only helped in restoring John's reputation but also provided him with a sense of justice and relief.

Our ability to leverage our experience in such cases enabled us to offer John the support and expertise necessary to overcome the hurdles he faced. This experience underscores the critical role of specialised legal intervention in cases of online defamation, particularly when they involve severe and baseless criminal accusations.

Search the entire site

a flat out uncond

Signature cases

Our work featured on

Latest Articles

Explore this topic!