Defamation and social media expert lawyers. Best defamation solicitor

Internet Law Specialist Lawyers FREE CALL 0800 612 7211

Yair Cohen Lawyer of the Year Award.jpg

What our clients say...
"More than I bargained for..."
“I have had a good consultation with Cohen Davis solicitors. I was pleasantly surprised... Read More...
Contact our super friendly Social Media lawyers today!

Click HERE to Call Free for immediate help! 0800 612 7211


Every situation is different so by far the best way to find out how to respond to a social media legal issue is to speak to those who are most likely to have dealt with a situation similar to yours.
To find out how you can improve your reputation on the internet simply select one of the easy methods of contacting us.

Please use the form below to contact us.
We will respond as soon as possible.


Or you can call us on our free hotline.

FREEPHONE  0800 612 7211

(+) 44 207 183 4 123 from outside the UK.

Or if you prefer you can email us to helpline (at)

TheInternet LawCentre

Lindsey Goldrick Dean v Paul Curran

The case of Lindsey Goldrick

Cohen Davis win the longest case of online harassment in the UK since the invention of the internet

After 13 years of suffering harassment at the hands of her troll, Paul Curran, social media lawyer Yair Cohen helped Lindsey Goldrick Dean get her life back.

Why is the case of Lindsey Goldrick-Dean important

What were the facts of the case of Goldrick-Dean v Paul Curran

Why did it take so long to bring to justice Ms Goldrick-Dean online harasser

Why is the case of Lindsey Goldrick-Dean important

The facts of the case of Lindsey Goldrick are similar to many other cases of online harassment in the UK. At the same time, the case of Lindsey Goldrick was one of the most important cases in the history of online harassment in the UK. In a landmark case, Cohen Davis Solicitors have taken the place of the police to finally put an end to the longest recorded campaign of harassment in the UK.

The case, which was concluded on the 9th July 2018 at the High Court in London, saw another online trolling victim win damages and a court order to restrain her troll from ever harassing her again. Solicitor Yair Cohen who helps harassment victims win cases where the police are unable to assist, said that “there was little justification for the police to leave Lindsey Goldrick Dean to fend for herself in view of the overwhelming evidence against her harasser Paul Curran. The case gives hope to women who suffer sustained online harassment and who receive little or no support from the police.” In addition to being awarded undisclosed amount of damages, Mrs Goldrick Dean’s barrister read a statement in open court setting out the extent of her harassment.

Lindsey Goldrick-Dean Case Legal Importance FAQ

The case of Lindsey Goldrick-Dean is significant because it marks a landmark moment in the fight against online harassment in the UK. It set a precedent for holding online harassers accountable when the police are unable to assist victims effectively.

Paul Curran employed various tactics in his online harassment campaign, including designing and publishing websites named after his victim, posting offensive content about her, and using search engine optimization (SEO) to ensure these websites ranked prominently in search results for her name. He also used social media to spread harmful content.

Lindsey Goldrick-Dean reported her harassment to the police on multiple occasions, but the initial response was a warning to the harasser, Paul Curran. When the police later decided to close the investigation, Lindsey sought legal help but faced challenges in finding a solicitor willing to take on the complex case.

The case took approximately 13 years to bring Paul Curran to justice due to various factors, including the police's initial reluctance to take effective action, the evasive nature of the harasser, and the complexity of the online harassment campaign. It required significant legal effort to secure an admission of guilt from the harasser.

What were the facts of the case of Goldrick-Dean v Paul Curran

Throughout the period of harassment, Paul Curran harassed his victim by designing and publishing websites, some of which were named after his victim and all of which contained materials about her, including a mixture of offensive, private and/or confidential information. He then e-mailed, telephoned, and sent post to her friends and family, to bring the said websites to their attention.

He deliberately ‘search engine optimised’ the offensive websites to try and ensure that they ranked prominently on a search of his victim’s name and bought a Google banner advertisement which included a photograph of his victim and a link to one of the websites.

He continued by creating two user accounts on Twitter, using his victim’s name. To each account, he posted messages containing his victim’s photograph and a link to one of the websites. Like many of the online harassment cases that our harassment lawyers take on, this case was challenging, as we were facing an evasive and a particularly difficult internet troll, with knowledge and understanding of computers, websites and SEO, who despite having plenty of opportunities to do so, refused to take responsibility for his own actions.

Why did it take so long to bring to justice Ms Goldrick-Dean's online harasser

The case of Lindsey Goldrick

It took approximately 13 years to bring Mr Curran to justice. Ms Goldrick-Dean reported him to the police on at least three occasions. Initially, the police warned Mr Curran about his harassing behaviour, but he then continued to harass his victim. There was very little appetite by the police to reopen the investigation and after Mr Curran went to work in Germany for a while, the police decided to close the investigation.

After asking the police to re-open the case investigation a few times, Ms Goldrick-Dean was pushed away for the last time when a policewoman admitted to her that the police had no idea how to deal with the matter.

Ms Goldrick-Dean then sought the help of various solicitors and law firms, but no one was willing to take on a case, which involved 13 years’ worth of evidence, an evasive defendant and a devastated harassment victim with no money. It took nearly a year of legal work for Yair Cohen to bring Mr Curran to admit to the harassment of his victim.

Search the entire site

a flat out uncond

Signature cases

Our work featured on

Latest Articles

Explore this topic!

Online defamation