Defamation and social media expert lawyers. Best defamation solicitor

Internet Law Specialist Lawyers FREE CALL 0800 612 7211

Recently removed from the internet
What our clients say...
"Thank you and your team so very much for giving us our lives back."
“I would like to very deeply thank Yair, Louise and Adam for giving my family, in... Read More...
Contact our super friendly Social Media lawyers today!

Click HERE to Call Free for immediate help! 0800 612 7211

 

Every situation is different so by far the best way to find out how to respond to a social media legal issue is to speak to those who are most likely to have dealt with a situation similar to yours.
To find out how you can improve your reputation on the internet simply select one of the easy methods of contacting us.

 
Please use the form below to contact us.
We will respond as soon as possible.

 

 
 
 
 
 
 
Or you can call us on our free hotline.

FREEPHONE  0800 612 7211

(+) 44 207 183 4 123 from outside the UK.

Or if you prefer you can email us to helpline (at) CohenDavis.co.uk.

TheInternet LawCentre

Professional harassment and threats to disclose private information

Professional harassment and threats to disclose private information

What do to if you are harassed by a work associate

Harassment by a work colleague or associate is becoming an increasingly concerning issue for numerous executives.

Summary

This case details the distressing experience of Alex, a high-profile marketing executive at a multinational corporation, who became the target of persistent harassment by a former colleague, Lee. Initially, Lee sought a professional collaboration, but her conduct quickly devolved into unprofessional and invasive behaviour, including threats to tarnish Alex's reputation and unwelcome contact with his family. The situation severely impacted Alex's mental health, work performance, and family relationships, leading him to seek legal recourse under English and Welsh law against harassment and malicious communications.

The case underscores the critical importance of employer responsibility in safeguarding employees against harassment, highlighting the potential for claims of constructive dismissal and the necessity for employers to actively prevent and respond to harassment to avoid legal, financial, and reputational damage. It also delves into the legal considerations surrounding emergency privacy injunctions, emphasising the need for swift, effective legal action to protect individuals' privacy and well-being.

From a legal perspective, the case exemplifies the challenges of navigating harassment claims, particularly in balancing rapid legal intervention with ensuring fairness and due process. It demonstrates the importance of substantiating claims with concrete evidence and the broader implications for workplace harassment precedents. The lawyer's role extended beyond legal representation, providing vital support to Alex in managing the personal and professional fallout of the harassment.

The main teaching of the article is the paramount importance of understanding and upholding the duty of care employers have towards their employees, the legal mechanisms available to victims of harassment, and the crucial role of swift and decisive legal action in addressing and remedying such situations.

Work colleague threatens to disclosure private information

In this reimagined scenario, our client is a high-profile marketing executive, referred to as Alex, working at a prominent multinational corporation. Alex, with a distinguished 15-year career, has been pivotal in steering successful international campaigns and is a respected figure in the corporate world. In mid-2022, Alex was approached by a former colleague, Lee, during a professional networking event. Lee, having left the corporate sector to start a consulting business, expressed interest in collaborating with the company on a new marketing project.

Intrigued by Lee's proposal and the potential business opportunity, Alex engaged in preliminary discussions. Alex and Lee engaged in several meetings to discuss the project's potential. However, Lee began exhibiting unprofessional behaviour, sending Alex frequent and unsolicited messages outside of work hours, often blurring the lines between professional and personal communication. 

Despite Alex’s efforts to maintain a strictly professional relationship, the behaviour of Lee took a troubling turn. She began sending Alex a series of inappropriate messages and emails, which increasingly made Alex uncomfortable. The situation worsened when Lee started threatening to spread false rumours about Alex's professional conduct and personal life, especially after Alex did not reciprocate her advances.

The harassment even permeated Alex's personal life, with Lee attempting to reach out to Alex's family members via social media. Lee’s actions showed a disturbing level of obsession, including attempts to be present at private events where Alex was in attendance.

Deciding to take legal action to stop the harassment

The cumulative effect of these incidents began to severely impact Alex's mental health and work performance. Alex found himself grappling with heightened levels of anxiety and stress, coupled with a pervasive fear for personal safety. This state of constant apprehension and discomfort led to a noticeable decline in productivity at work. Moreover, the situation strained Alex's relationships with family members, further exacerbating the stress and emotional turmoil experienced.

Upon consulting with a legal team, it was determined that Lee's actions could potentially violate several laws under the jurisdiction of England and Wales, where the incidents occurred. The behaviours could constitute harassment as per the Protection from Harassment Act 1997 and potentially other offences under the Malicious Communications Act 1988.

Consideration whether to apply for an emergency privacy injunction

Whether a particular professional harassment case is suitable for an emergency injunction, would depend on the facts of each case. An emergency hearing would often expedite the legal process, aiming to provide immediate relief from the harassment. However, if there is no real urgency in the application, the result could be counter productive, causing unnecessary delays in the matter. The decision whether to seek an emergency hearing in harassment cases is often contingent on demonstrating the immediate and serious nature of the threat. If the threat is imminent and real, and if the threat includes a threat to disclose private information, then, the likelihood of a successful emergency injunction application is increased.  

To succeed with an emergency injunction application, your legal team has to be prepared to present compelling evidence and legal arguments to justify why normal court timelines should be bypassed.

Your legal team will need to carefully balance these considerations. They need to ensure the effectiveness of their legal actions while also protecting you, as a client from having your private information disclosed. 

Employer duty of care to harassed employee

The employer's liability in situations where an employee, such as Alex, is harassed while performing their duties, stems from the legal obligation to provide a safe and secure working environment. This duty of care encompasses protecting employees from harm, including psychological harm due to harassment. When an employer neglects this responsibility, particularly in cases involving harassment, they fail to uphold their legal and moral obligations to their employees. This neglect can lead to a host of legal and non-legal consequences.

Legally, the employer could face claims of constructive dismissal, which occurs when an employee feels compelled to resign due to the employer's breach of contract, including failure to prevent harassment. This is predicated on the notion that the employer's inaction or inadequate action has fundamentally breached the terms of employment, making the employee's position untenable. Constructive dismissal claims can be costly, involving compensation for lost earnings and, in some cases, additional damages for emotional distress.

Beyond constructive dismissal, the employer might also be liable for violating employment laws that protect workers from harassment and discrimination. These laws impose specific duties on employers to actively prevent and respond to harassment claims. Failure to comply can result in legal penalties, including fines and compensation payments to the victim, alongside mandatory changes to workplace policies and practices.

The consequences of neglect extend into the realm of employee morale and organisational reputation. When employers do not address harassment, it can create a toxic workplace environment, leading to decreased productivity, increased absenteeism, and difficulty retaining and attracting talent. The perception of an employer who does not protect their employees can also tarnish their reputation amongst potential employees, customers, and investors, potentially leading to a decline in business opportunities and profitability.

Furthermore, neglecting employee well-being in such serious matters can have long-term impacts on the mental and physical health of employees, leading to increased healthcare costs and potential litigation related to workplace stress and illness. In essence, the failure to address harassment not only exposes the employer to legal liability but also undermines the foundation of trust and safety that is essential for a productive and positive workplace culture.

Lawyer's thoughts about the case

From the lawyer's perspective, the case was a navigation through the fine line of professional relationships and the distinction between professional networking and harassment. The urgency and sensitivity of the matter were paramount, requiring a balance between swift legal action and ensuring due process and fairness, particularly in proceeding without notice to Lee. Collecting and presenting concrete evidence of harassment, especially digital communication, was a significant challenge, necessitating a demonstration of the persistence and impact of Lee's actions.

The lawyer was also acutely aware of the mental and emotional toll such harassment cases can have on individuals. This understanding influenced the legal strategy, aiming to secure quick relief for Alex while minimising additional stress. The broader legal implications of the case were also at the forefront of the lawyer's mind. Successfully securing an injunction could set a precedent for similar cases in the corporate sector, highlighting the importance of addressing workplace harassment seriously.

Beyond legal advice, the lawyer also provided crucial support to Alex, offering counsel on coping with both the personal and professional impact of the harassment.

Case studies are based on true cases where names, dates and circumstances have often been amended to protect the identity of those involved.

Search the entire site
 

a flat out uncond

Signature cases

Our work featured on

Latest Articles

Explore this topic!