Defamation and social media expert lawyers. Best defamation solicitor

Internet Law Specialist Lawyers FREE CALL 0800 612 7211

Recently removed from the internet

Law Society Awards winners. Cohen Davis

What our clients say...
"great support throughout the case"
“Yair, Thank you very much for all your hard work and support during that difficult... Read More...
Contact our super friendly Social Media lawyers today!

Click HERE to Call Free for immediate help! 0800 612 7211

 

Every situation is different so by far the best way to find out how to respond to a social media legal issue is to speak to those who are most likely to have dealt with a situation similar to yours.
To find out how you can improve your reputation on the internet simply select one of the easy methods of contacting us.

 
Please use the form below to contact us.
We will respond as soon as possible.

 

 
 
 
 
 
 
Or you can call us on our free hotline.

FREEPHONE  0800 612 7211

(+) 44 207 183 4 123 from outside the UK.

Or if you prefer you can email us to helpline (at) CohenDavis.co.uk.

TheInternet LawCentre

  • Defamation by disgruntled former employees

    Defamation by disgruntled former employees

    How to protect employers from online defamation by former employees

    The issue of online defamation by ex-employees has become increasingly troubling for organisations. Because managing online narratives can be challenging, you should do whatever you can to safeguard your organisation against defamation by former employees.

  • Defamation and a job reference

    Defamation and a job reference

    What to do if your former employer gives a defamatory job reference

    The impact of an employer's reference on a job applicant's prospects cannot be overstated. A positive reference serves as a powerful endorsement, highlighting the applicant's competencies and suitability for the role. Conversely, a negative reference can significantly hinder their chances of securing the position. 

    Table of content

    Steps to take if given a defamatory reference

    Legal rights over a defamatory reference

    Proving a reference is defamatory

    Can the defendant defend a claim over a defamatory reference

    Does a defamatory job reference count as negligence

    Can a defamatory reference be seen in an employment tribunal

    Is it possible to sue a former employer following a defamatory job reference

    What defences an employer might use in a defamation claim for a job reference

    Can employment tribunals handle defamation claims linked to unfair dismissal

    Steps to take if given a defamatory reference

    In situations where a past employer has given a defamatory reference, which unfairly harms your reputation, there are several steps you can take. Firstly, it's crucial to understand the content of the reference and how it may be perceived as defamatory. Next, consider reaching out to the employer to discuss the issue and seek a resolution. If this approach doesn't yield results, legal advice may be necessary to assess your options for addressing the defamatory remarks and mitigating their impact on your career.

    In a nutshell

    Addressing Defamatory Job References

    Understanding the Impact: An employer's reference plays a crucial role in a job applicant's future employment opportunities, where a negative reference can severely hinder their prospects.

    Steps to Take: If you receive a defamatory reference, it's essential to first understand the content, consider discussing it with the former employer, and, if necessary, seek legal advice to explore remedies and possibly mitigate its impact on your career.

    Legal Rights: You have the right to litigate if a previous employer provides a defamatory reference. Successful claims can lead to compensation, especially if the reference contains false information leading to job rejections.

    Proving Defamation: Establishing a defamation case requires showing that the reference was provided with malice, a significant hurdle given defenses available to former employers, such as truth and qualified privilege.

    Defenses Employers Might Use: Employers can defend against defamation claims by proving the truth of the reference's statements or claiming qualified privilege, which protects them if they had a duty to provide the reference.

    Employment Tribunal's Role: Defamatory job references related to unfair dismissal can be addressed within an employment tribunal, which can consider both defamation and unfair dismissal aspects.

    Suing for Defamation: It is possible to sue a former employer for a defamatory job reference, focusing on the false and damaging nature of the reference and overcoming potential defenses like truth and qualified privilege.

    Legal rights over a defamatory reference

    A job applicant has the legal right to pursue litigation if they receive a defamatory reference from a previous employer. Such references might include incorrect or misleading information that leads to the applicant being turned down for a new position. Additionally, the reference could violate the applicant's right to privacy by disclosing sensitive details like medical records or criminal history. If a reference is proven to be defamatory, the applicant might be entitled to compensation from the individual who provided the reference.

    For the reference to be considered defamatory, it must have been shared with a third party, resulting in harm or damage to the applicant. To establish a case of defamation, the applicant must demonstrate that the reference contained false or misleading statements, and that it was delivered with the intent of damaging their reputation or hindering their job prospects. However, it's important to note that recent legal precedents in England have shown a lack of support for former employees claiming defamation due to a negative job reference, even when such references have evidently impeded their ability to find new employment.

    While it is possible to sue for defamation over a negative job reference, proving that the reference has harmed your reputation is essential. Former employers who provided the reference have various defenses at their disposal, especially if the ex-employees perceive the reference as an unjustly negative or defamatory evaluation of their work history. This legal landscape suggests that while the path to suing over a defamatory job reference exists, it is fraught with challenges and complexities.

    Proving a reference is defamatory

    To initiate a successful lawsuit against a former employer for defamation due to a job reference, certain key elements must be established. Primarily, it is essential to prove that the defamatory job reference was provided with malice. This means demonstrating that the former employer issued the reference with the intention to harm your reputation or with reckless disregard for the truth. One of the critical challenges in such cases is overcoming the defense of truth. If the former employer can convincingly argue that they believed the contents of the reference to be true at the time they provided it, this defense can effectively nullify your defamation claim. It is not enough to merely show that the reference was negative or harmful, you must provide evidence that the employer either knew the information was false or acted with a high degree of negligence regarding the truth.

    Additionally, proving defamation involves showing that the reference was not only false but also damaging to your professional reputation. This often requires establishing a direct link between the reference and the negative outcomes you experienced, such as being rejected for a job opportunity. It's also important to consider any applicable legal nuances in your jurisdiction, as defamation laws can vary significantly. In some regions, additional elements such as the requirement to prove actual malice or special damages might be necessary. Seeking legal advice to navigate these complexities and to understand the specific requirements in your area is highly advisable before proceeding with a defamation lawsuit against a former employer.

    Can the defendant defend a claim over a defamatory reference

    In defending against a defamation claim related to a job reference, a former employer typically relies on two main strategies: asserting the truth of the statements made in the reference and claiming qualified privilege. Firstly, the employer must demonstrate a genuine belief in the truthfulness of the information provided in the job reference. This means they need to show that, at the time of writing the reference, they believed the contents to be accurate. This defense hinges on the idea that if the statements in the reference are true, or at least were believed to be true, they cannot constitute defamation.

    Secondly, the defense of qualified privilege is often invoked. This legal principle applies when the employer had a legal, social, or moral duty or interest to communicate the information to the recipient of the reference. The concept of qualified privilege recognises that in certain relationships or situations, such as between a former employer and a prospective employer, the communication of certain information, even if it turns out to be inaccurate, should be protected to encourage frankness and honesty. For example, in a notable case where a former employee sued their employer for providing a defamatory job reference, the court acknowledged that the reference was defamatory.

    However, it also recognised that the relationship between the provider of a reference (the former employer) and the recipient (the potential new employer) satisfied the criteria for qualified privilege. The court ruled that because the reference was given in a context where there was a duty to provide honest feedback, and it was given to someone with a legitimate interest in receiving it, the communication was protected under the doctrine of qualified privilege. It's important to note that these defenses can be complex and their applicability may vary depending on the specifics of the case and the jurisdiction. Additionally, if it can be proven that the employer acted with malice – that is, with the intent to harm the former employee’s reputation or with reckless disregard for the truth – the defense of qualified privilege may not hold. Legal advice is typically recommended for navigating these nuanced areas of defamation law.

    Does a defamatory job reference count as negligence

    It is indeed possible to pursue legal action against a former employer for negligence in cases where a defamatory job reference has caused you harm. When suing for negligence, the focus shifts from the malicious intent behind the defamation to the employer's failure to exercise reasonable care in providing an accurate and fair job reference. A job reference is a critical document that significantly influences employment opportunities. It is expected to provide a truthful and fair evaluation of an employee's performance and conduct.

    If an employer negligently provides a reference that contains false or misleading information, and this leads to harm such as loss of job opportunities or reputational damage, the former employee may have grounds to sue for negligence. In cases where it can be proven that the employer acted with malice, that is, with deliberate intent to harm or with reckless disregard for the truth, the former employee may also seek punitive damages. Punitive damages are awarded in addition to actual damages and are intended to punish the wrongdoer and deter similar conduct in the future. Another important consideration is the statute of limitations for bringing legal action. In the context of defamation, the limitation period is typically shorter, often around 12 months.

    In contrast, negligence claims generally have a longer limitation period, which can extend up to 6 years in some jurisdictions. This extended timeframe provides a broader window for former employees to initiate legal proceedings. However, it's crucial to understand that legal standards for proving negligence differ from those for defamation. In negligence cases, the focus is on the employer's duty of care and whether there was a breach of that duty leading to harm. The complexities of such cases, including the need to prove causation and damages, make it advisable to seek professional legal advice to assess the merits of a case and navigate the legal process.

    Can a defamatory reference be seen in an employment tribunal

    Indeed, under certain circumstances, it is possible to bring a case to an employment tribunal involving a defamatory job reference, particularly if it is connected with an issue of unfair dismissal. If you have been unfairly dismissed and subsequently received a defamatory reference from your former employer, the employment tribunal can address both the defamation aspect and the unfair dismissal claim. This approach is rooted in the principle that the employment tribunal is a specialised forum designed to handle employment-related disputes, including unfair dismissal. This was underscored in a significant High Court decision. In this case, the High Court declined a defamation claim linked to an unfair dismissal, highlighting that Parliament intended for unfair dismissal cases, and any resultant loss claims, to be adjudicated within the specialised framework of the employment tribunal.

    The rationale behind directing these cases to employment tribunals is to maintain coherence in the legal process. Allowing employees to pursue what are essentially unfair dismissal claims through other legal avenues could enable them to circumvent the statutory cap on damages typically imposed in unfair dismissal cases. Moreover, in other courts, claimants might seek to recover legal costs, which is not a common practice in employment tribunal proceedings. Therefore, if your defamation claim is intricately linked with an employment dispute, particularly unfair dismissal, the High Court is likely to be hesitant in hearing your case.

    It may view itself as not the most appropriate venue for what is fundamentally an employment law dispute. This approach helps to streamline employment-related legal processes and ensures that cases are heard in the most suitable forum, one that is specifically equipped to handle the nuances of employment law. However, it's important to consult with a legal professional to understand the specific details and viability of your case within the framework of your jurisdiction's legal system.

    Is it possible to sue a former employer following a defamatory job reference

    Yes, you can sue your former employer if their defamatory job reference has caused you harm. To successfully pursue a defamation claim, you need to prove that the reference contained false information that was communicated with malice or reckless disregard for the truth.

    If your former employer can demonstrate they believed the information was true or if they had a legal, social, or moral duty to provide the reference (qualified privilege), it could be a valid defense against your claim. Additionally, if the defamatory reference is linked to an unfair dismissal, it might be more appropriate to address this within an employment tribunal.

    What defences an employer might use in a defamation claim for a job reference

    A former employer can defend against a defamation claim primarily through two arguments: the truth of the statements in the reference and qualified privilege. They will need to show they genuinely believed the information in the reference was true.

    Additionally, they might claim qualified privilege, arguing that they had a legal, social, or moral obligation to provide the reference. This defense applies when the employer had a duty to communicate honest feedback to someone with a legitimate interest in receiving it, like a potential new employer.

    Can employment tribunals handle defamation claims linked to unfair dismissal

    Yes, if your defamatory job reference is related to an unfair dismissal, you can bring this issue to an employment tribunal. The tribunal can address both the defamation and the unfair dismissal aspects. This approach is consistent with legal precedents indicating that employment tribunals are the appropriate venue for handling disputes related to unfair dismissal, including any consequential claims of loss.

    The High Court is generally reluctant to hear cases that are essentially employment disputes, preferring them to be resolved within the specialised employment tribunal system.

  • Publicly listed companies and claims for defamation

    Publicly listed companies and claims for defamation

    Defamation by Investors Case study

    This case study demonstrates how companies may manage a situation where defamation by shareholders results in losses, profits or reputation woes!

  • Interim injunctions in defamation cases

    Interim injunctions in defamation cases

    Emergency defamation injunctions: A guide

    When it comes to online defamation, individuals and organisations often face the critical decision of whether to seek legal intervention before harmful content is published. Understanding the nuances of interim injunctions for defamation is crucial for anyone seeking to protect their reputation pre-emptively. This article aims to explain, in simple terms, the concept of interim defamation injunctionsand the considerations involved in pursuing one.

  • Disclosure from US companies and website operators

    Disclosure from USA websites and companies

    How to obtain disclosure from a website operator if you live outside the United States

    Numerous strategies exist for obtaining disclosure from a website, online platform, or company based in the United States. It is difficult to find an attorney who is highly experienced in securing disclosure orders from the US at speed and in a cost-effective way.

  • What can you do about fake online reviews

    What can you do about fake online reviews

    How do you fight fake reviews

    Online reviews can significantly impact a business's reputation and bottom line. However, not all reviews are genuine; fake and defamatory online reviews  are a growing concern. Businesses, particularly small ones, can find themselves at the mercy of false accusations on the internet, often orchestrated by competitors. This deceptive practice not only skews public perception but can lead to serious financial harm.

  • How to deal with defamatory content on social media

    How to deal with defamatory content on social media

    What to do when a user posts defamatory content about you on social media

    It's no secret that social media can be a breeding ground for defamatory content. Whether it's an ex-partner airing your dirty laundry, or a disgruntled employee badmouthing your company, this type of content can have a major impact on your reputation.

  • Defamation on Twitter case

    Defamation on Twitter

    Defamation on Twitter by an anonymous user

  • Legal action for libel

    Legal action for libel

    How to make a sensible decision whether to take legal action for libel

  • Take down negative articles from the internet

    Take down negative articles from the internet

    How to take down negative articles from the internet

  • The case of RRR PLC v Gary Carp

    Defamation by investors

    Defamation by investor case where a shareholder was held liable for defaming a company

  • Defamation solicitors

    Defamation solicitors

    Defamation solicitors with focus on internet and social media law

  • Case study on removing defamatory review for a small business

    Remove defamatory review for a small business

    Strategies and approaches for removing fake online reviews

    In this case study, we explore the challenges faced by a small business suffering from defamatory online reviews and the strategic approach taken by a law firm to effectively remove fake online content. By examining the specific steps, legal tactics, and collaborative efforts employed, this article aims to provide valuable insights for businesses dealing with similar issues and highlight the importance of a tailored, cost-effective approach to addressing online defamation and protecting a company's reputation.

  • Online reputation attack legal advice

    Online reputation attack

    How to respond to an online reputation attack

  • A review of Cohen Davis legal practice

    A review of Cohen Davis legal practice

    Why clients choose to work with Cohen Davis Solicitors

  • Defamation removal letter

    Defamation removal letter

    Slander and libel warning letter to the website operator

  • Defamation injunctions

    Defamation injunctions

    Is it possible to obtain defamation injunctions prior to publication

  • Reputation crisis management

    Reputation crisis management

    How to handle PR and reputation crisis

  • Business defamation on Google

    Business defamation on Google

    What to do if your business is defamed on Google

  • Defamation by investors on social media

    Defamation by investors on social media

    Defamation against a company and defamation against directors

  • Defamation by employees

    Defamation by employees

    How to prevent becoming a victim of defamation by former employees and partners

  • Fake online reviews against a dental clinics case study

    Online reviews and dental clinics

    How dental clinics can effectively deal with fake and defamatory online reviews

  • How can I stop someone from defaming my business

    How do I stop someone from defaming my business

    How can a business defend itself against defamation online

    What happens when a business is being defamed online? Can anything be done about it or free speech is king? The following case study gives some answers to these questions by considering a typical situation of online defamation which small and medium size business often face.

  • Why choose Cohen Davis solicitors

    Why choose Cohen Davis solicitors

    Social media lawyers and internet law specialists

Search the entire site
 

Follow on Twitter

a flat out uncond

Our work featured on

Latest Articles

Explore this topic!

Online defamation